[nsp-sec] [Fwd: GLBX De-Peers Intercage

[Chris Morrow]

On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, David Freedman wrote:

> ----------- nsp-security Confidential --------
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> In case people on nanog didn't spot this....
>
>
> - -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post:
> Atrivo/Intercage, w	hy are we peering with the American RBN?]
> Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:43:38 GMT
> From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawg at netzero.net>
> To: marc at sans.org
> CC: nanog at merit.edu
> Newsgroups: gmane.org.operators.nanog
>
> - -- "Marc Sachs" <marc at sans.org> wrote:
>
>> Unless I'm mis-reading this (or perhaps GBLX read Kreb's story and said
>> good-bye to Atrivo/Intercage), it looks like they are no longer their
>> upstream:
>>
>> http://cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS27595&v=4&view=2.0
>>
>
> I applaud GLBX's move to disconnect Atrivo/Intercage.

.. to stop accepting routes from atrivo/intercage. there isn't any direct 
evidence that they stopped being a customer. In the past Atrivo has had 
relationships with providers that included simply sending traffic and not 
routes. (atrivo had this relationship with As4436 for quite some time, 
probably even to this day)

of course... maybe gblx did shut the interface down :) maybe one of the 
2-3 gblx people on-list can even say?

-chris