[Outages-discussion] Bandwidth.com outage

Thu Feb 16 13:27:17 EST 2012

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

I guess that's one way of shifting access traffic (eyeballs traffic) so
traffic volumes exchanged be roughly balanced ;-)

Seriously, I guess LOA and /or prefix filters are simply being ignored
or was it peering setup between bandwidth.com and brighthouse went
south....<head scratching>.

regards,
/virendra

On 02/16/2012 09:41 AM, Dan White wrote:
> Moving to outages-discussion.
> 
> For those who may not be on the nanog list. Note the email address of the
> sender:
> 
> http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2012-February/045186.html
> 
> On 02/16/12 10:38 -0500, Michael R. Self wrote:
>> Bandwidth informed us yesterday morning that the issue is closed.   They
>> issued a formal RFO that puts blame squarely on "another transport
>> provider" that was broadcasting their routes and they worked with this
>> unnamed provider.
>> </whatiknow>
>>
>> ____________________________________________
>>
>>
>> Michael R Self
>> My PhoneFusion ONE number - 954.644.5000
>> (office/home/fax/mobile/SMS/VoIP)
>> Disclaimer: If this email isn't for you, get rid of it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/16/12 10:31 AM, "Robert Kulagowski" <rkulagow at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Robin Rodriguez
>>> <rrodriguez at ifbyphone.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Bandwidth.com hasn't issued an all-clear but CORE2 Orig is functioning
>>>> again for us out of LA and NYC
>>>
>>> Was a final RFO ever posted? Was this something that bandwidth.com did
>>> "wrong", or was it because someone started announcing their prefixes?
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iF4EAREIAAYFAk89SoUACgkQ3HuimOHfh+Gq4gD5AScrVo+mvCBfhAaRA/yrWwaY
taPRURT/dr2EoStw9YoA/1yi8Ol1TZ3G5KdwsBXpjQXQnl5XeBwawNdFPaU9m7tu
=Agwq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----