[Outages-discussion] [outages] Facebook Outage

[Aaron C. de Bruyn]

With all the outrage over discussions on outages@ list, why not have
mailman set the reply-to headers to be outages-discuss@?

That way you have to go out of your way to post on outages@

-A

On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 4:44 PM Eric Tykwinski <eric-list at truenet.com> wrote:

> > On Aug 3, 2018, at 7:35 PM, Scott Weeks <surfer at mauigateway.com> wrote:
> >
> > --- ogg at sr375.com wrote:
> > From: Neal Lawson <ogg at sr375.com>
> >
> > Hey, im one of those who post cat pictures, I
> > guess I could start posting them here… when
> > facebook is down…
> > -------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > No, those are supposed to be posted on the outages
> > list, not outages-discussion.  Go ahead.  I still
> > have a lot of popcorn left... ;-)
> >
>
> I can haz catz?
>
> Seriously,  I have no problems people posting a quick note that Provider X
> is down.
> Best practices would be supply a link to a status page and if it’s posted
> yet or perhaps a Down Detector/Twitter link.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Eric Tykwinski
> TrueNet, Inc.
> P: 610-429-8300 <(610)%20429-8300>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Outages-discussion mailing list
> Outages-discussion at outages.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages-discussion/attachments/20180803/5cb9dbaf/attachment.html>