[Outages-discussion] Outages vs Outages-Discussion

Jay Ashworth jra at baylink.com
Fri Dec 13 12:31:10 EST 2019


Weather the machinery presently doing the work is going to permit multi-party moderation is an open question as well, which I will have to take up with the mechanic in question. :-)

On December 13, 2019 12:27:22 PM EST, Grant Taylor <gtaylor at tnetconsulting.net> wrote:
>On 12/12/19 6:10 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>> Unless we can come up with 12 to 15 people to put on that moderation
>Q, 
>> it's not going to do the thing that it was designed to do, which is 
>> provide people with *timely* notification of outages.
>
>That seems like a reasonable concern.
>
>I don't know if I'm qualified to help or not, but I'm happy to raise my
>
>hand and volunteer.
>
>I will also say that we probably want multiple volunteers across many 
>time zones to achieve around the clock coverage.
>
>
>
>-- 
>Grant. . . .
>unix || die

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages-discussion/attachments/20191213/302d018e/attachment.htm>


More information about the Outages-discussion mailing list