[Outages-discussion] List suggestion?

[Mike Bolitho]

I am in agreement here. I would rather not push confirmations to a
different list. The problem with the Facebook outage was that it also
impacted this list. Typically you don't have that many me too messages.
Maybe 4 or 5. But because nobody else saw a confirmation, they were just
chiming in to confirm. Then when everything got unclogged, the backlog
inundated us. This was a one-off. I wouldn't change policy based on this
singular issue.

- Mike Bolitho

On Thu, Oct 7, 2021, 11:44 AM Joey Kelly <joey at joeykelly.net> wrote:

> On Thursday, October 7, 2021 1:33:06 PM CDT Eric Tykwinski wrote:
> > > May I offer a suggestion for Jared and anyone in charge of the Outages
> > > list?
> > >
> > > Could the outages list be set such that the “reply to” would
> automatically
> > > be outages-discussion?
> > >
> > > I was thinking that would significantly cut down on the “me too”
> > > responses.
> >
> > I would second that suggestion...
> >
> > Eric
>
> So one little BGP outage and you want to change the reply target? ;-)
>
> But what of those that don't know they have to be subbed to both lists? I
> think it'll cause more confusion than it's worth.
>
> $.02
>
> --Joey
>
> >
> > > Just a thought.
> > >
> > > ----
> > > Andy Ringsmuth
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Outages-discussion mailing list
> > Outages-discussion at outages.org
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion
>
>
> --
> Joey Kelly
> Minister of the Gospel and Linux Consultant
> http://joeykelly.net
> 504-239-6550
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Outages-discussion mailing list
> Outages-discussion at outages.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages-discussion/attachments/20211007/6b36004f/attachment.htm>