[Outages-discussion] Nightly AT&T outage on path to certain sites

CJ cjwright at gmail.com
Mon Jan 31 17:22:55 EST 2022


Might be worthwhile to login to the AT&T route server during that time and
see how the routing table looks.

telnet route-server.ip.att.net

rviews/rviews


show route 72.26.113.0/24




-Chris

On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 8:54 AM Eduard <etieseler at metrolist.net> wrote:

> Curious if anyone has been seeing issues accessing certain sites with AT&T
> as your ISP. Seems to mostly affect northern California.
>
>
>
> It starts roughly around 7:30 PM Pacific time and is working again in the
> morning.
>
>
>
> Below is a failed and successful traceroute. Anyone else seeing anything
> similar? AT&T support has been an excellent … firewall … at getting to
> anyone useful that would be able to resolve this issue.
>
>
>
> Failed:
>
> traceroute to sacmsso.rapmls.com (72.26.113.104), 64 hops max, 52 byte
> packets
>
> 1  172.16.40.1 (172.16.40.1)  6.608 ms  5.795 ms  134.370 ms
>
> 2  192.168.1.254 (192.168.1.254)  6.932 ms  5.998 ms  5.015 ms
>
> 3  172-9-164-1.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net (172.9.164.1)  7.681 ms
> 136.346 ms  10.492 ms
>
> 4  71.147.199.76 (71.147.199.76)  9.440 ms  120.867 ms  7.360 ms
>
> 5  12.122.160.166 (12.122.160.166)  10.686 ms  105.594 ms  9.686 ms
>
> 6  12.122.2.78 (12.122.2.78)  147.798 ms  47.183 ms  13.577 ms
>
> 7  12.122.114.5 (12.122.114.5)  12.394 ms  39.740 ms  11.997 ms
>
> 8  * * *
>
> 9  * * *
>
>
>
> Working:
>
> traceroute to sacmsso.rapmls.com (72.26.113.104), 64 hops max, 52 byte
> packets
>
> 1  172.16.40.1 (172.16.40.1)  6.398 ms  9.862 ms  3.846 ms
>
> 2  192.168.1.254 (192.168.1.254)  5.835 ms  4.889 ms  4.610 ms
>
> 3  172-9-164-1.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net (172.9.164.1)  5.983 ms
> 5.927 ms  5.980 ms
>
> 4  71.147.199.76 (71.147.199.76)  13.065 ms  8.224 ms  7.662 ms
>
> 5  12.122.160.166 (12.122.160.166)  15.948 ms  12.303 ms  17.810 ms
>
> 6  12.122.2.78 (12.122.2.78)  12.036 ms  15.065 ms  17.014 ms
>
> 7  12.122.114.5 (12.122.114.5)  12.024 ms  12.189 ms  11.051 ms
>
> 8  192.205.37.70 (192.205.37.70)  13.407 ms  13.516 ms  15.354 ms
>
> 9  if-ae-26-2.tcore2.sv1-santaclara.as6453.net (209.58.86.36)  21.055 ms
>
>     if-ae-18-2.tcore2.sv1-santaclara.as6453.net (63.243.205.73)  20.964 ms
>
>     if-ae-18-5.tcore2.sv1-santaclara.as6453.net (63.243.205.37)  23.039 ms
>
> 10  if-ae-0-2.tcore1.sv1-santaclara.as6453.net (63.243.251.1)  20.844 ms
> 22.154 ms  21.141 ms
>
> 11  if-ae-60-2.tcore1.lvw-losangeles.as6453.net (63.243.250.55)  22.369 ms
>
>     if-ae-8-3.tcore1.lvw-losangeles.as6453.net (63.243.250.59)  24.226 ms
>
>     if-ae-8-5.tcore1.lvw-losangeles.as6453.net (63.243.250.63)  21.236 ms
>
> 12  66.110.59.253 (66.110.59.253)  22.648 ms  22.208 ms  21.728 ms
>
> 13  xe-1-1-0.ar01-dtla01.alchemy.net (66.186.30.30)  22.228 ms  22.450
> ms  20.991 ms
>
> 14  * * *
>
>
>
> -Eduard
> _______________________________________________
> Outages-discussion mailing list
> Outages-discussion at outages.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages-discussion/attachments/20220131/be860907/attachment.htm>


More information about the Outages-discussion mailing list