[Outages-discussion] Outages lists configuration thoughts

[Andy Ringsmuth]

Apparently someone on this list either didn’t like my suggestion/discussion thoughts or carries personal animus towards me.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-3.tiff
Type: image/tiff
Size: 112322 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages-discussion/attachments/20240223/a6654533/attachment-0001.tiff>
-------------- next part --------------



Come on, people. Lets be adults here. If you’ve got a problem with me, be an adult and reach out to me off-list. Don’t be a child and take it upon yourself to try and unsubscribe me.


-Andy


> On Feb 23, 2024, at 9:22 AM, Russell Zen <russellzen at outlook.com> wrote:
> 
> General reply (not to Gert but just in general)
> 
> "lol" 
> 
> If you know you know 
> 
> On Feb 23, 2024 8:10 AM, Gert Doering via Outages-discussion <outages-discussion at outages.org> wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 08:53:15AM -0600, Andy Ringsmuth via Outages-discussion wrote: 
> > Having said that, can we PLEASE consider setting the ???Reply To:??? default for the outages list to be outages-discussion? That is definitely an option within the Mailman list configuration. 
> 
> Generally I do not like Reply-To: on lists (because I inevitably send 
> replies to the list when I want to reply off-list) but in this case it 
> seems useful. 
> 
> On the "5 lines posted on top of a full top quote of a digest" topic, 
> not sure this sort of human carelessness is solvable in a technical manner. 
> 
> gert