[outages] Intermittent Level 3 outage/connectivity issues on Dallas edges?

Jeremy Chadwick jdc at koitsu.org
Thu Jan 24 14:39:22 EST 2013


Chris, is there some reason you're not providing actual
source/destination IPs for each of your mtrs?

The reason I'm asking is because I was left to believe what you were
providing was both ends of an asymmetric connection (i.e. mtr #1 was
for x.x.x.x to y.y.y.y, mtr #2 was for y.y.y.y to x.x.x.x).

However, your 2nd paragraph below ("we're seeing issues over one
connections but not another") seems to indicate what you provided are
two mtrs across completely different circuits.

So which is it?

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwick                                   jdc at koitsu.org |
| UNIX Systems Administrator                http://jdc.koitsu.org/ |
| Mountain View, CA, US                                            |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.             PGP 4BD6C0CB |

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 06:14:05AM +1100, Chris Boulton wrote:
> Thanks, I am aware of what the traceroute shows and how a traceroute works.
> The intent of the traceroute was primarily to show where I see our paths
> between Level 3 and TW Telecom converge.
> 
> Plain and simple - we are experiencing connectivity issues over our Level 3
> connection, which we're not seeing over our TW Telecom connection for
> traffic destined to the same location.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Chris Boulton
> Bigcommerce
> 
> Email: chris at bigcommerce.com
> 
> Web: http://www.bigcommerce.com/
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <jdc at koitsu.org> wrote:
> 
> > Please see my below post on this matter, which I posted only 2 days ago:
> >
> > https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/2013-January/005111.html
> >
> > What you've shown in your mtr does not show any issue of any kind with
> > Level 3.  The packet loss shown at hops 4/5/6 does not "trickle down"
> > each subsequent hop (look at hop 7 onward for proof), nor is there any
> > sign of latency increase either.
> >
> > On the other hand, the 2nd mtr you provided shows some degree of packet
> > loss starting at hop 2 (TW Telecom) which *does* "trickle down" through
> > all subsequent hops (egress).  If you want to know how many packets were
> > lost, look at the --order flag to mtr (I recommend --order=LSRNABW).
> >
> > Plain and simple: talk to TW Telecom about the loss in their network.
> >
> > --
> > | Jeremy Chadwick                                   jdc at koitsu.org |
> > | UNIX Systems Administrator                http://jdc.koitsu.org/ |
> > | Mountain View, CA, US                                            |
> > | Making life hard for others since 1977.             PGP 4BD6C0CB |
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 05:46:27AM +1100, Chris Boulton wrote:
> > > Seeing connectivity issues as traffic passes through Level 3 in Dallas -
> > > not seeing the same issues for where routes converge (above.net in DFW)
> > > over our TW Telecom link.
> > >
> > > Anybody else experiencing this as well?
> > >
> > > Level 3:
> > >
> > >  Host                                                     Loss%   Snt
> > > Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
> > >  1. vlan358.car1.Houston1.Level3.net                       0.0%   167
> > >  105.9  80.5  31.7 276.4  59.8
> > >  2. ae-2-5.bar1.Houston1.Level3.net                        0.0%   167
> > > 32.5  34.6  32.2  93.8   7.3
> > >  3. ae-13-13.ebr1.Dallas1.Level3.net                       0.0%   167
> > > 39.5  37.4  36.7  41.2   0.9
> > >  4. ae-91-91.csw4.Dallas1.Level3.net                      65.1%   167
> > > 44.5  43.5  39.7  53.8   4.0
> > >  5. ae-4-90.edge2.Dallas3.Level3.net                       5.4%   166
> > > 37.1  37.9  36.1  75.6   5.1
> > >  6. ex-3-1-0.er1.dfw2.us.above.net                        66.1%   166
> > > 39.5  43.5  38.9 104.8  12.5
> > >  7. xe-3-1-0.cr1.dfw2.us.above.net                         0.0%   166
> > > 37.3  40.4  37.0 114.1  10.6
> > >  8. xe-0-0-0.er3.dfw2.us.above.net                         0.0%   166
> > > 36.2  39.8  36.1  99.3  10.2
> > >
> > >  Host                                                     Loss%   Snt
> > > Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
> > >  1. 50.58.18.1                                             0.0%   829
> > >  4.3  23.9   4.1 121.2  14.5
> > >  2. dal2-pr2-xe-0-3-0-0.us.twtelecom.net                   0.1%   829
> > > 55.4  31.2   9.4 121.0  17.2
> > >     dal2-pr2-xe-2-3-0-0.us.twtelecom.net
> > >  3. xe-3-0-0.er2.dfw2.us.above.net                         0.1%   829
> > > 44.8  31.6   9.5 143.7  17.9
> > >  4. xe-0-1-0.cr2.dfw2.us.above.net                         0.2%   829
> > > 40.5  31.2  10.3 116.2  15.9
> > >     xe-3-0-0.cr2.dfw2.us.above.net
> > >  5. xe-0-2-0.er3.dfw2.us.above.net                         0.2%   829
> > > 42.7  32.4   9.6 109.2  16.5
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Chris Boulton
> > > Bigcommerce
> > >
> > > Email: chris at bigcommerce.com
> > >
> > > Web: http://www.bigcommerce.com/
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Outages mailing list
> > > Outages at outages.org
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
> >
> >



More information about the Outages mailing list