[outages] level3 LA
jd
jd at boldnetworks.net
Tue Mar 11 16:41:47 EDT 2014
2.|-- cr2.la2ca.ip.att.net 0.0% 1000 13.2 16.2 9.6 126.4
15.6
3.|-- ggr2.la2ca.ip.att.net 0.0% 1000 9.7 15.7 8.6 144.1
16.9
4.|-- 192.205.37.146 0.0% 1000 10.9 15.8 10.6 149.3
16.8
5.|-- vl-3508-ve-122.ebr1.tusti 0.0% 1000 9.9 14.3 9.6 120.3
15.4
6.|-- ae-6-6.ebr1.losangeles1.l 0.0% 1000 13.6 18.7 13.5 132.4
16.2
7.|-- ae-81-81.csw3.losangeles1 0.0% 1000 12.6 17.2 12.3 147.4
16.5
8.|-- ae-3-80.edge3.losangeles1 7.3% 1000 12.5 16.7 12.3 140.6
15.8
9.|-- b.resolvers.level3.net 8.0% 1000 30.8 33.4 16.4 161.3
16.6
2.|-- ae7.cr1.lax112.us.above.n 0.1% 1000 2.9 5.6 2.5 69.4 7.5
3.|-- ae8.mpr1.lax12.us.above.n 21.7% 1000 2.7 3.2 2.4 63.9 4.7
4.|-- ae7.edge2.LosAngles.Level 4.9% 1000 2.7 3.4 2.5 85.7 6.3
5.|-- ae-1-60.edge3.LosAngeles1 6.1% 1000 3.4 2.8 2.5 21.9 1.9
6.|-- b.resolvers.Level3.net 9.3% 1000 18.3 19.7 10.7 24.9 1.7
problem is now gone..
2.|-- cr2.la2ca.ip.att.net 0.0% 50 11.8 11.6 9.7 13.6 0.9
3.|-- ggr2.la2ca.ip.att.net 0.0% 50 10.0 10.8 8.7 12.7 1.0
4.|-- 192.205.37.146 0.0% 50 10.7 12.1 10.7 72.0 8.6
5.|-- vl-3508-ve-122.ebr1.tusti 0.0% 50 9.9 9.9 9.7 11.8 0.3
6.|-- ae-6-6.ebr1.losangeles1.l 0.0% 50 13.6 13.8 13.5 15.7 0.3
7.|-- ae-81-81.csw3.losangeles1 0.0% 50 14.6 12.8 12.4 20.2 1.1
8.|-- ae-3-80.edge3.losangeles1 0.0% 50 12.3 12.8 12.3 29.5 2.4
9.|-- b.resolvers.level3.net 0.0% 50 12.0 18.7 11.7 29.4 5.8
On 3/11/2014 10:28 AM, Tri Tran wrote:
> We couldn't ping one IP in Tustin from the outside (was able to ping
> from same network) from 6:45am- 8:05am PST.
> Problem went away around 8:15 AM PST.
> Weird that only one IP was affected.
> --
> Tri Tran
> On 3/11/2014 10:15 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> Your 1st traceroute shows loss happening within the Los Angeles region
>> possibly within Level3 (hop #8 from the look of it, and it looks like
>> multipathing is involved). Because traceroutes going only one direction
>> are provided (due to the destination you chose and the nature of
>> asymmetric routing), only half of the picture is shown, which is why I
>> say "possibly".
>>
>> Your 2nd traceroute shows two things;
>>
>> - Loss showing up starting at hop #3 (possibly within Zayo/Abovenet
>> space, again "possibly", re: asymmetric routing)
>> - Loss showing up at hop #8 (could be an effect of something happening
>> earlier in the path)
>>
>> For reference, here are your traceroutes:
>>
>> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/2014-March/006787.html
>>
>> So when you say "I think it's a problem with Tustin > LA", the 2nd
>> traceroute you provided doesn't seem to support that theory, nor the
>> statement "I am unable to reproduce it to any other network".
>>
>> Do you have any other tools available to you, like mtr? mtr won't
>> narrow down where the issue is happening, but would make it more clear
>> as to where the issue is happening, especially if you let it run for a
>> while (say 10 minutes or so) from both places (you didn't provide source
>> IPs for either traceroute, so that doesn't help either).
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Outages mailing list
> Outages at outages.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/attachments/20140311/b6a5223a/attachment.htm>
More information about the Outages
mailing list