<html><head></head><body>An argument that has been going on on nanog for about 30 years now, yes. ;-)<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On June 8, 2022 11:30:44 AM EDT, Simon Lockhart <simon@slimey.org> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre dir="auto" class="k9mail">On Wed Jun 08, 2022 at 11:25:59am -0400, Jay Ashworth via Outages wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">Is there any just cause for a wide area carrier like Lumen to pass a network<br>level protocol like DHCP? Cause I can't think of one...<br></blockquote><br>Centralised DHCP server in conjunction with DHCP relay at remote sites.<br><br>If I were buying an Internet service, I wouldn't expect my service provider<br>to arbitarily block some ports (unless it's to protect against an ongoing <br>network attack, and it was communicated to customers).<br><br>Simon<br></pre></blockquote></div><div style='white-space: pre-wrap'><div class='k9mail-signature'>-- <br>Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</div></div></body></html>