<div dir="auto">It looks like Microsoft services may be having issues again. One Drive not loading properly, Microsoft Store issues and other MS issues.<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Regards,</div><div dir="auto">John-Paul Reed</div><div dir="auto">IT Consultant</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Aug 5, 2024, 9:18 AM <<a href="mailto:outages-request@outages.org">outages-request@outages.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Send Outages mailing list submissions to<br>
<a href="mailto:outages@outages.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">outages@outages.org</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:outages-request@outages.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">outages-request@outages.org</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
<a href="mailto:outages-owner@outages.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">outages-owner@outages.org</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of Outages digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. Re: Microsoft Azure, 365 and status page all apparently down.<br>
(Shaun Potts)<br>
2. Re: Microsoft Azure, 365 and status page all apparently down.<br>
(Josh Luthman)<br>
3. Centurylink down in Colorado (Casey Johnson)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 13:09:11 -0400<br>
From: Shaun Potts <<a href="mailto:shaun.m.potts@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">shaun.m.potts@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: Bill Woodcock <<a href="mailto:woody@pch.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">woody@pch.net</a>><br>
Cc: Jeff Martinez <<a href="mailto:jeff@bbdp.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">jeff@bbdp.com</a>>, Chris Adams via Outages<br>
<<a href="mailto:outages@outages.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">outages@outages.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [outages] Microsoft Azure, 365 and status page all<br>
apparently down.<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:CAMQvQDfa5Sry7Ofbkkb4gQnRo992hEn89tnTojVGZc88h8hiQQ@mail.gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">CAMQvQDfa5Sry7Ofbkkb4gQnRo992hEn89tnTojVGZc88h8hiQQ@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
i find it *really **really *hard to believe that you or your org doesn't<br>
use AD, or GitHub, or any external service that interfaces with<br>
Entra/AAD/whatever microsoft has named it this month, or <you name it here><br>
but if that's the case, good on you. other cloud providers have outages<br>
too, just as bad, and in the grand scheme of things just as frequently,<br>
just not recently.<br>
<br>
also worth saying, crowdstrike still wasn't a microsoft issue, aside from<br>
being the affected platform. crowdstrike has caused kernel panics on linux<br>
machines too *shrug*<br>
<br>
anyways, not looking to get into a nerd fight with someone who has<br>
realistically done a lot for the world's internet infrastructure,<br>
<br>
it always just really saddens me when i see people in prestigious positions<br>
in tech taking positions like this, which are really below people in their<br>
station. i guess i would just say try to put on a better face as someone<br>
people in tech should be looking up to instead of gaining internet points<br>
by batting at low-hanging fruit when a major provider has a major outage.<br>
<br>
next time layer3 or akamai or <insert backbone provider here> has a major<br>
outage, would you quickly jump to go "haha, not affected here either!" or<br>
are you just letting personal bias get in the way of rational discourse?<br>
<br>
my $0.02<br>
<br>
(p.s. neither of the companies i work for or make technical decisions for<br>
have a huge foot in microsoft tech either, this is just me being purely<br>
objective)<br>
<br>
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 12:49?PM Bill Woodcock <<a href="mailto:woody@pch.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">woody@pch.net</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
><br>
><br>
> > On Jul 30, 2024, at 18:37, Shaun Potts <<a href="mailto:shaun.m.potts@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">shaun.m.potts@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> > right because no vendor any of us use has interdependencies with<br>
> microsoft services<br>
><br>
> That was exactly my point. Some people make choices which prove to have<br>
> Microsoft dependencies, some don?t. It?s a choice. Some people make it<br>
> each way. Then Microsoft has yet another outage, as they VERY FREQUENTLY<br>
> do, and somehow, some people are surprised, all over again. But it was<br>
> their choice. Some people try to convince themselves that Microsoft is in<br>
> the ?death and taxes? category. This is just your reminder that it?s not,<br>
> it?s in the ?self harm/own-goal? category. If you were affected, AGAIN,<br>
> you could make other choices, and join the camp that doesn?t have anything<br>
> to complain about when Microsoft has an outage AGAIN.<br>
><br>
> Admittedly, I was a bit worried at first when I saw airlines complaining<br>
> about the Crowdstrike/Microsoft outage, but my travel was all on United,<br>
> and it turned out that they hadn?t made the mistake of using either<br>
> anywhere critical, just on kiosk display stuff. So, good for them, though<br>
> it would be better if they didn?t flirt with these kinds of risks at all,<br>
> since they seemingly propagate when people aren?t paying attention.<br>
><br>
> -Bill<br>
><br>
><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/attachments/20240730/22c2f0a8/attachment-0001.htm" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/attachments/20240730/22c2f0a8/attachment-0001.htm</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 13:16:18 -0400<br>
From: Josh Luthman <<a href="mailto:josh@imaginenetworksllc.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">josh@imaginenetworksllc.com</a>><br>
To: Shaun Potts <<a href="mailto:shaun.m.potts@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">shaun.m.potts@gmail.com</a>><br>
Cc: Bill Woodcock <<a href="mailto:woody@pch.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">woody@pch.net</a>>, Chris Adams via Outages<br>
<<a href="mailto:outages@outages.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">outages@outages.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [outages] Microsoft Azure, 365 and status page all<br>
apparently down.<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:CAN9qwJ-%2Bf6FJFheUxWVdKw24rZ9Xxr9v7vrRMqQtAVEOUJAGyA@mail.gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">CAN9qwJ-+f6FJFheUxWVdKw24rZ9Xxr9v7vrRMqQtAVEOUJAGyA@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
PLEASE discuss in outages-discussion@<br>
<br>
Please post any outage updates in outages@<br>
<br>
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 1:09?PM Shaun Potts via Outages <<a href="mailto:outages@outages.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">outages@outages.org</a>><br>
wrote:<br>
<br>
> i find it *really **really *hard to believe that you or your org doesn't<br>
> use AD, or GitHub, or any external service that interfaces with<br>
> Entra/AAD/whatever microsoft has named it this month, or <you name it here><br>
> but if that's the case, good on you. other cloud providers have outages<br>
> too, just as bad, and in the grand scheme of things just as frequently,<br>
> just not recently.<br>
><br>
> also worth saying, crowdstrike still wasn't a microsoft issue, aside from<br>
> being the affected platform. crowdstrike has caused kernel panics on linux<br>
> machines too *shrug*<br>
><br>
> anyways, not looking to get into a nerd fight with someone who has<br>
> realistically done a lot for the world's internet infrastructure,<br>
><br>
> it always just really saddens me when i see people in prestigious<br>
> positions in tech taking positions like this, which are really below people<br>
> in their station. i guess i would just say try to put on a better face as<br>
> someone people in tech should be looking up to instead of gaining internet<br>
> points by batting at low-hanging fruit when a major provider has a major<br>
> outage.<br>
><br>
> next time layer3 or akamai or <insert backbone provider here> has a major<br>
> outage, would you quickly jump to go "haha, not affected here either!" or<br>
> are you just letting personal bias get in the way of rational discourse?<br>
><br>
> my $0.02<br>
><br>
> (p.s. neither of the companies i work for or make technical decisions for<br>
> have a huge foot in microsoft tech either, this is just me being purely<br>
> objective)<br>
><br>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 12:49?PM Bill Woodcock <<a href="mailto:woody@pch.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">woody@pch.net</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> > On Jul 30, 2024, at 18:37, Shaun Potts <<a href="mailto:shaun.m.potts@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">shaun.m.potts@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> > right because no vendor any of us use has interdependencies with<br>
>> microsoft services<br>
>><br>
>> That was exactly my point. Some people make choices which prove to have<br>
>> Microsoft dependencies, some don?t. It?s a choice. Some people make it<br>
>> each way. Then Microsoft has yet another outage, as they VERY FREQUENTLY<br>
>> do, and somehow, some people are surprised, all over again. But it was<br>
>> their choice. Some people try to convince themselves that Microsoft is in<br>
>> the ?death and taxes? category. This is just your reminder that it?s not,<br>
>> it?s in the ?self harm/own-goal? category. If you were affected, AGAIN,<br>
>> you could make other choices, and join the camp that doesn?t have anything<br>
>> to complain about when Microsoft has an outage AGAIN.<br>
>><br>
>> Admittedly, I was a bit worried at first when I saw airlines complaining<br>
>> about the Crowdstrike/Microsoft outage, but my travel was all on United,<br>
>> and it turned out that they hadn?t made the mistake of using either<br>
>> anywhere critical, just on kiosk display stuff. So, good for them, though<br>
>> it would be better if they didn?t flirt with these kinds of risks at all,<br>
>> since they seemingly propagate when people aren?t paying attention.<br>
>><br>
>> -Bill<br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
> Outages mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Outages@outages.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Outages@outages.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages</a><br>
><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/attachments/20240730/e231836b/attachment-0001.htm" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/attachments/20240730/e231836b/attachment-0001.htm</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 3<br>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 14:11:22 +0000<br>
From: Casey Johnson <<a href="mailto:casey@coloradointerlink.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">casey@coloradointerlink.com</a>><br>
To: "<a href="mailto:outages@outages.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">outages@outages.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:outages@outages.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">outages@outages.org</a>><br>
Subject: [outages] Centurylink down in Colorado<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:PH0PR17MB5487055DFFF03645813F30FEABBE2@PH0PR17MB5487.namprd17.prod.outlook.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">PH0PR17MB5487055DFFF03645813F30FEABBE2@PH0PR17MB5487.namprd17.prod.outlook.com</a>><br>
<br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
Anyone with Lumen/Centurylink fiber or MPLS circuits in Colorado down? I have 5 customers that are down hard right now.<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/attachments/20240805/5fd7439a/attachment.htm" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/attachments/20240805/5fd7439a/attachment.htm</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Subject: Digest Footer<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Outages mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Outages@outages.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Outages@outages.org</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages</a><br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
End of Outages Digest, Vol 190, Issue 1<br>
***************************************<br>
</blockquote></div>