[rbak-nsp] SE-400 IP Pool Help
Sherwin Ang
sherwin.ang at gmail.com
Sun Dec 7 06:46:10 EST 2008
Hello Redback List,
i've added a new IP Pool to our SE-400 using this configuration:
interface IPPOOL
ip address 200.96.0.1/30
!
interface POOL multibind lastresort
ip unnumbered IPPOOL
ip pool 200.96.96.0/19
ip pool 200.96.204.0/22
ip pool 200.96.252.0/22
subscriber default
ip address pool name POOL
timeout idle 10
ppp mtu 1492
Everything works great with regards to the Pool on our PPPoE but the
problem now is how the routes are redistributed and aggregated on our
BGP.
I have this configuration to aggregate and redistribute the routes.
router bgp vpn
address-family ipv4 unicast
export route-target 999:4
import route-target 999:4
redistribute connected
redistribute subscriber address
redistribute static
aggregate-address 200.96.96.0/19 summary-only
aggregate-address 200.96.204.0/22 summary-only
aggregate-address 200.96.252.0/22 summary-only
it looks correct but when i take a look at the BGP peer's routing
table, it's getting a lot of /32's from the subscriber pool. i now
have like 8,000+ of them and growing. The routes are not advertised
without redistribute subscriber. I tried putting a route-map and a
prefix-filter to match only the supernets (/19's,/22's) but since it's
still sending /32's, it won't match.
I hope someone can point me to the right direction.
Thank you.
-Sherwin
More information about the redback-nsp
mailing list