[rbak-nsp] redback-nsp Digest, Vol 15, Issue 3
Milyh Maxim Vadimovich
maxim at sinet.ru
Wed Mar 11 06:31:33 EDT 2009
10 ìàðòà 2009 ã. â 12:00:09GMT -0400 (that beside I correspond to 19:00)
redback-nsp-request at puck.nether.net has written their own considerations on subject "redback-nsp Digest, Vol 15, Issue 3":
> Send redback-nsp mailing list submissions to
> redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/redback-nsp
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> redback-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> redback-nsp-owner at puck.nether.net
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of redback-nsp digest..."
> Today's Topics:
> 1. SE100 and etherchannel ? (Marcin Kuczera)
> 2. Re: SE100 and etherchannel ? (David Freedman)
> 3. Fwd: SE100 and etherchannel ? (Ron Ripley)
> 4. Re: SE100 and etherchannel ? (Sridhar)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:59:18 +0100
> From: Marcin Kuczera <marcin at leon.pl>
> Subject: [rbak-nsp] SE100 and etherchannel ?
> To: redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Message-ID: <49B558F6.1080403 at leon.pl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> hello,
> is it possible to bind 2 ethernet ports in SE100 just like "aggregate
> ethernet" in Juniper ?
> Regards,
> Marcin
> ------------------------------
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:25:15 +0000
> From: David Freedman <david.freedman at uk.clara.net>
> Subject: Re: [rbak-nsp] SE100 and etherchannel ?
> To: Marcin Kuczera <marcin at leon.pl>, redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Message-ID: <49B56D1B.9070904 at uk.clara.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> No idea about the SE100 but here is roughly how to do it for SE400/800
> !
> link-group mylag ether
> lacp [ active | passive ]
> lacp priority [ 1-65535 ]
> bind interface some_int local
> !
> port eth 1/1
> link-group mylag
> !
> port eth1/2
> link-group mylag
> !
> For dot1q trunks, use "dot1q" instead of ether
> Dave.
> Marcin Kuczera wrote:
>> hello,
>>
>> is it possible to bind 2 ethernet ports in SE100 just like "aggregate
>> ethernet" in Juniper ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Marcin
>> _______________________________________________
>> redback-nsp mailing list
>> redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/redback-nsp
>>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> iEYEARECAAYFAkm1bRkACgkQtFWeqpgEZrIOvQCgosrYhPB6dQYX3Kk2YMeTrvXA
> Cf4Anj1yycGFOocPMMGFYcbeSH8ju3DT
> =2dyV
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> ------------------------------
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 13:43:10 -0600
> From: Ron Ripley <ripleydotnet at gmail.com>
> Subject: [rbak-nsp] Fwd: SE100 and etherchannel ?
> To: redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Message-ID: <12414F7D-6C33-4BAE-B1E5-1D23F7BBDDDD at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
> Adding rbak-nsp list, forgot to do reply-all on my original response.'
>>
>> On 9-Mar-09, at 12:41 PM, Ron Ripley wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Marcin,
>>>
>>> It is possible with the use of LAG (Link Aggregation) link-groups
>>> to bind 2 ethernet ports on the SE100.
>>>
>>> Here is an example from the SEOS Documentation (Ports, Circuits,
>>> and Tunnels Configuration Guide)
>>>
>>> The following example shows how to create an interface, etherx, in
>>> the local context, assign an IP address to each one, create an
>>> Ethernet link group, lg-ether and bind it to the interface, etherx.
>>> Then the FE or GE ports are configured and added to the link group
>>>
>>> Create the link group interface and assign an IP address to it:
>>> [local]Redback(config)#context local
>>> [local]Redback(config-ctx)#interface etherx
>>> [local]Redback(config-if)#ip address 172.16.0.1/24
>>> [local]Redback(config-if)#exit
>>>
>>> Create the link group and bind it to its interface:
>>> [local]Redback(config)#link-group lg-ether ether
>>> [local]Redback(config-link-group)#bind interface etherx local
>>>
>>> Configure an FE port and add it to the link group:
>>> [local]Redback(config-config)#port ethernet 5/4
>>> [local]Redback(config-port)#no shutdown
>>> [local]Redback(config-port)#link-group lg-ether
>>> [local]Redback(config-port)#exit
>>>
>>> Configure another FE port and add it to the link group:
>>> [local]Redback(config-config)#port ethernet 5/5
>>> [local]Redback(config-port)#no shutdown
>>> [local]Redback(config-port)#link-group lg-ether
>>> [local]Redback(config-port)#exit
>>>
>>> Hope this helps.
>>>
>>> Ron
>>>
>>> On 9-Mar-09, at 11:59 AM, Marcin Kuczera wrote:
>>>
>>>> hello,
>>>>
>>>> is it possible to bind 2 ethernet ports in SE100 just like
>>>> "aggregate ethernet" in Juniper ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Marcin
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> redback-nsp mailing list
>>>> redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/redback-nsp
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ron Ripley
>>> ripleydotnet at gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ron Ripley
>> ripleydotnet at gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Ron Ripley
> ripleydotnet at gmail.com
> ------------------------------
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 12:54:47 -0700
> From: Sridhar <manisridhar at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [rbak-nsp] SE100 and etherchannel ?
> To: David Freedman <david.freedman at uk.clara.net>
> Cc: redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Message-ID:
> <bbfbf5610903091254k6b1b40ecvdb7fc1091bf8411f at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> The config below will work on SE100 if the etherchannel (link-group)
> type is ether/dot1q.
> SE100 does not support access link-group (say, for terminating PPPoE
> subscribers) since the constituent ports have to be on different slots
> (and there is only one slot on SE100).
> thanks
> sridhar
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:25 PM, David Freedman
> <david.freedman at uk.clara.net> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> No idea about the SE100 but here is roughly how to do it for SE400/800
>>
>> !
>> link-group mylag ether
>> lacp [ active | passive ]
>> lacp priority [ 1-65535 ]
>> bind interface some_int local
>> !
>> port eth 1/1
>> link-group mylag
>> !
>> port eth1/2
>> link-group mylag
>> !
>>
>> For dot1q trunks, use "dot1q" instead of ether
>>
>>
>>
>> Dave.
>>
>> Marcin Kuczera wrote:
>>> hello,
>>>
>>> is it possible to bind 2 ethernet ports in SE100 just like "aggregate
>>> ethernet" in Juniper ?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Marcin
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> redback-nsp mailing list
>>> redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/redback-nsp
>>>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>>
>> iEYEARECAAYFAkm1bRkACgkQtFWeqpgEZrIOvQCgosrYhPB6dQYX3Kk2YMeTrvXA
>> Cf4Anj1yycGFOocPMMGFYcbeSH8ju3DT
>> =2dyV
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> redback-nsp mailing list
>> redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/redback-nsp
>>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> redback-nsp mailing list
> redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/redback-nsp
> End of redback-nsp Digest, Vol 15, Issue 3
> ******************************************
Good afternoon, Redback-nsp-request.
Ê ñîæàëåíèþ, íà äàííûé ìîìåíò ÿ â êîìàíäèðîâêå. Ñâÿçàòüñÿ ñî ìíîé
ìîæíî ïî ìîáèëüíîìó.
--
Respectfully yours,
Head of network
development department
"Socrat-Integro Intercon" group
Milyh Maxim Vadimovich
Voronezh,Lenina 73
tel. +7(4732)391010,539878 ext.292
mailto:maxim at sinet.ru
http://www.intercon.ru
http://www.sinet.ru
MM9812-RIPE
Skype:aidmax
More information about the redback-nsp
mailing list