[rbak-nsp] ipv6 - strange ?? (ping)
David Freedman
david.freedman at uk.clara.net
Sun Mar 29 06:51:54 EDT 2009
What is the source IPv6 interface for your pings?
Is it reachable by all the destinations you are pinging?
Also, do you have an admin acl in place on the context?
------------------------------------------------
David Freedman
Group Network Engineering
Claranet Limited
http://www.clara.net
-----Original Message-----
From: redback-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net on behalf of Marcin Kuczera
Sent: Sun 3/29/2009 11:41
To: redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [rbak-nsp] ipv6 - strange ?? (ping)
Look at that, I have IPv6 /32 prefix, advertised via BGP.
Both peers are UP.
Neighbor AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Rst
Up/Down PfxRcvd/Sent
2001:7f8:42::a500:8545:1 8545 3095 3491 22392 0 0
14 2d01h 38 1
2a01:1d8:7fff:fffd:1::16 15744 11432 7919 22392 0 0
4 2d08h 1579 1
My interfaces:
Intf name: vlan101
Intf state: Up IPv6 MTU: 1500
Description: Silweb
Address: 2a01:1d8:7fff:fffd:1::15 Prefix len: 126
Link local addr:fe80::230:88ff:fe12:59f Number of Bound Circuits
(incl. dynamic) = 1
Intf name: vlan102
Intf state: Up IPv6 MTU: 1500
Description: PLIX
Address: 2001:7f8:42::a501:3000:1 Prefix len: 64
Link local addr:fe80::230:88ff:fe12:59f Number of Bound Circuits
(incl. dynamic) = 1
Intf name: vlan201
Intf state: Up IPv6 MTU: 1500
Description: serwerownia komercyjna
Address: 2a02:c40:1::1 Prefix len: 48
Link local addr:fe80::230:88ff:fe12:5a0 Number of Bound Circuits
(incl. dynamic) = 1
##################
now - the problem (vlan101):
[bgp1]RedBack_SE100#ping 2a01:1d8:7fff:fffd:1::15
PING6 2a01:1d8:7fff:fffd:1::15 : 8 data bytes
timeout is 1 second, source 2a01:1d8:7fff:fffd:1::15
.....
--- 2a01:1d8:7fff:fffd:1::15 ping6 statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
[bgp1]RedBack_SE100#ping 2a01:1d8:7fff:fffd:1::16
PING6 2a01:1d8:7fff:fffd:1::16 : 8 data bytes
timeout is 1 second, source 2a01:1d8:7fff:fffd:1::15
.....
--- 2a01:1d8:7fff:fffd:1::16 ping6 statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
1 2a01:1d8:7fff:fffd:1::15 3.955 ms 3.489 ms 3.761 ms
[bgp1]RedBack_SE100#trace 2a01:1d8:7fff:fffd:1::16
traceroute6 to 2a01:1d8:7fff:fffd:1::16 from 2a01:1d8:7fff:fffd:1::15,
30 hops max, 12 byte packets
1 * * *
^C[bgp1]RedBack_SE100#trace 2a01:1d8:7fff:fffd:1::15
traceroute6 to 2a01:1d8:7fff:fffd:1::15 from 2a01:1d8:7fff:fffd:1::15,
30 hops max, 12 byte packets
1 2a01:1d8:7fff:fffd:1::15 4.172 ms 1.481 ms 1.656 ms
(vlan102):
[bgp1]RedBack_SE100#ping 2001:7f8:42::a500:8545:1
PING6 2001:7f8:42::a500:8545:1 : 8 data bytes
timeout is 1 second, source 2001:7f8:42::a501:3000:1
!!!!!
--- 2001:7f8:42::a500:8545:1 ping6 statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 6.649/7.014/7.445/0.317 ms
[bgp1]RedBack_SE100#ping 2001:7f8:42::a501:3000:1
PING6 2001:7f8:42::a501:3000:1 : 8 data bytes
timeout is 1 second, source 2001:7f8:42::a501:3000:1
.....
--- 2001:7f8:42::a501:3000:1 ping6 statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
[bgp1]RedBack_SE100#trace 2001:7f8:42::a501:3000:1
traceroute6 to 2001:7f8:42::a501:3000:1 from 2001:7f8:42::a501:3000:1,
30 hops max, 12 byte packets
1 2001:7f8:42::a501:3000:1 3.839 ms 2.355 ms 2.785 ms
What is going wrong ???
Is it so unstable or what ???
SEOS 6.1.4.1.p4
Regards,
Marcin
_______________________________________________
redback-nsp mailing list
redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/redback-nsp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/redback-nsp/attachments/20090329/dfe51eb0/attachment.html>
More information about the redback-nsp
mailing list