[rbak-nsp] redback-nsp Digest, Vol 28, Issue 12

Alireza Soltanian soltanian at gmail.com
Sat Apr 17 06:17:55 EDT 2010


The Solution for this case is defining one normal PPPoE Multibind Interface
and one PPPoE Multibind lastresort. 

-----Original Message-----
From: redback-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:redback-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
redback-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2010 12:51 PM
To: redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: redback-nsp Digest, Vol 28, Issue 12

Send redback-nsp mailing list submissions to
	redback-nsp at puck.nether.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/redback-nsp
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	redback-nsp-request at puck.nether.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	redback-nsp-owner at puck.nether.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of redback-nsp digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. problem of authentification on last-resort interface (Greg GOUDOU)
   2. Re: problem of authentification on last-resort interface
      (Denis Mikhaylovskiy)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:22:01 -0400
From: "Greg GOUDOU" <greg.goudou at gmail.com>
To: <redback-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [rbak-nsp] problem of authentification on last-resort
	interface
Message-ID: <4bc88eab.0e67f10a.4504.ffffb071 at mx.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

 

Hi, 

 

I meet a problem about a  configuration. I cannot create in a same context,
2 multibind last-resort interfaces.

But,  I already have a PPPoE client connected in this context (we will
called "context A"). Below, his configuration: 

 

Context A vpn-rd XXXX:6

interface Loop_client1 loopback

  ip address A.B.C.D/32 with A.B.C.D/32 is a public IP address

 

interface PPP-client1 multibind lastresort

 ip unnumbered Loop_client1

 

the second client is configured as defined below : 

 

Context A vpn-rd XXXX:6

interface Loop_client2 loopback

  ip address A.B.F.G/32 with A.B.F.G/32 is a public IP address 

 

interface PPP-client2 multibind

  ip unnumbered Loop_client2

 

when we verify the state of the connection of the clients, we notice : 

For client 1: 

client1 at realm.xx

        Agent Remote ID   "client1"

        Circuit   4/8 vlan-id 426 pppoe 21240

        Internal Circuit   4/8:1023:63/6/2/44395

        Interface bound  PPP-client1

        Current port-limit unlimited

        context-name A (applied)

        dns primary X.X.X.X (applied)

        dns secondary Y.Y.Y.Y (applied)

        ip address A.B.C.D (applied)

        forward policy in FORWARD_FIRSTBOOT (applied)

 

For client2, I receive this state of connection:

client2 at realm.xx

        Agent Remote ID   "Client2"

        Circuit   4/8 vlan-id 401 pppoe 16731

        Internal Circuit   4/8:1023:63/6/2/34556

        Interface bound  PPP-client1

        Current port-limit unlimited

        context-name A (applied)

        dns primary X.X.X.X (applied)

        dns secondary Y.Y.Y.Y (applied)

        ip address A.B.F.G (applied)

        forward policy in FORWARD_FIRSTBOOT (applied)

 

Therefore, I would like these clients have each of them, a public IP address
and pass through their own interface bound. 

 

If somebody have a solution, let me know. 

 

Regards, 

 

gOOdman

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/redback-nsp/attachments/20100416/32cfaa95
/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 04:21:14 -0400
From: Denis Mikhaylovskiy <denis.mikhaylovskiy at ericsson.com>
To: "'greg.goudou at gmail.com'" <greg.goudou at gmail.com>,
	"'redback-nsp at puck.nether.net'" <redback-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [rbak-nsp] problem of authentification on last-resort
	interface
Message-ID:
	
<2B6B8CA0ACA1B243820A777B0DBA53255007D5F86E at EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
	
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi,
It is not possible to have more than one last-resort interface by design in
context.
Actually SmartEdge doesn't pass clients through multibind interfaces at all
:).

As per 'show subs active' output I can conclude that both clients got fixed
ip assignment by raidus. And I do not understand what is the problem.


/denis

________________________________
From: redback-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
To: redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
Sent: Fri Apr 16 11:22:01 2010
Subject: [rbak-nsp] problem of authentification on last-resort interface

Hi,

I meet a problem about a  configuration. I cannot create in a same context,
2 multibind last-resort interfaces.
But,  I already have a PPPoE client connected in this context (we will
called ?context A?). Below, his configuration:

Context A vpn-rd XXXX:6
interface Loop_client1 loopback
  ip address A.B.C.D/32 with A.B.C.D/32 is a public IP address

interface PPP-client1 multibind lastresort
 ip unnumbered Loop_client1

the second client is configured as defined below :

Context A vpn-rd XXXX:6
interface Loop_client2 loopback
  ip address A.B.F.G/32 with A.B.F.G/32 is a public IP address

interface PPP-client2 multibind
  ip unnumbered Loop_client2

when we verify the state of the connection of the clients, we notice :
For client 1:
client1 at realm.xx<mailto:client1 at realm.xx>
        Agent Remote ID   "client1"
        Circuit   4/8 vlan-id 426 pppoe 21240
        Internal Circuit   4/8:1023:63/6/2/44395
        Interface bound  PPP-client1
        Current port-limit unlimited
        context-name A (applied)
        dns primary X.X.X.X (applied)
        dns secondary Y.Y.Y.Y (applied)
        ip address A.B.C.D (applied)
        forward policy in FORWARD_FIRSTBOOT (applied)

For client2, I receive this state of connection:
client2 at realm.xx<mailto:client2 at realm.xx>
        Agent Remote ID   "Client2"
        Circuit   4/8 vlan-id 401 pppoe 16731
        Internal Circuit   4/8:1023:63/6/2/34556
        Interface bound  PPP-client1
        Current port-limit unlimited
        context-name A (applied)
        dns primary X.X.X.X (applied)
        dns secondary Y.Y.Y.Y (applied)
        ip address A.B.F.G (applied)
        forward policy in FORWARD_FIRSTBOOT (applied)

Therefore, I would like these clients have each of them, a public IP address
and pass through their own interface bound.

If somebody have a solution, let me know.

Regards,

gOOdman



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/redback-nsp/attachments/20100417/f06d6acd
/attachment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
redback-nsp mailing list
redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/redback-nsp


End of redback-nsp Digest, Vol 28, Issue 12
*******************************************
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4999 (20100404) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4999 (20100404) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 



More information about the redback-nsp mailing list