[rbak-nsp] Accepted way to shape L2TP subscribers
David Freedman
david.freedman at uk.clara.net
Wed Dec 15 08:40:59 EST 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Collective,
Wondering on the commonly accepted way of shaping L2TP subscribers.
Currently am using a PWFQ policy such:
qos policy RATECAP24M pwfq
rate maximum 24576
num-queues 4
queue 0 priority 0 weight 100
queue 1 priority 1 weight 100
queue 2 priority 2 weight 100
queue 3 priority 3 weight 100
!
Though I understand that this is achievable with both metering and
policing policies.
Wondering what the best way to do this is, considering I would rather
shape than police (i.e be kind to TCP and avoid bandwidth "sawtooth"
oscillations caused by TCP not backing off)
Was thinking of switching to metering simply to be able to add
marking to the policy as well.
Any advice appreciated.
Dave.
- --
David Freedman
Group Network Engineering
david.freedman at uk.clara.net
Tel +44 (0) 20 7685 8000
Claranet Group
21 Southampton Row
London - WC1B 5HA - UK
http://www.claranet.com
Company Registration: 3152737 - Place of registration: England
All the information contained within this electronic message from
Claranet Ltd is covered by the disclaimer at
http://www.claranet.co.uk/disclaimer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk0IxWsACgkQtFWeqpgEZrI8cwCghHfl4GKtABI2GaIltCgGUYMO
z60AoNjkatqTClVChZPD/tReFhboRXUy
=sTQZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the redback-nsp
mailing list