[rbak-nsp] off topic - GPON

[Delian Delchev]

Both
------Original Message------
From: Marcin Kuczera
To: delian.delchev at gmail.com
Cc: redback-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
Cc: redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [rbak-nsp] off topic - GPON
Sent: 19 Jul 2011 08:55

Delian Delchev wrote:
> Basically there is no interoperability. The lower layers may run but everyone has essential and proprietary management extensions that covers vlan, ip security, encryption, multicast and other configurations. All the interoperability tests check just frame exchange and omci channel but not complete configuration. Something more - there are interoperability issues even between the different chipset vendors. This is my experience at least.
> If you buy olt you have to use ont from the same vendor.

And you have been working with GPON, GEPON/EPON or both ?

Regards,
Marcin


> ------Original Message------
> From: Marcin Kuczera
> Sender: redback-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> To: redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [rbak-nsp] off topic - GPON
> Sent: 18 Jul 2011 22:49
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'am writting here because some of you probably have a contact with xPON 
> systems.
> 
> What can you (if you can ;) say about GPON (not GEPON) interoperability ?
> 
> I mean, let's pick Ericsson's OLT. Do you have any experience when 
> operator want's to use a lot of different ONUs ?
> 
> I'am interested up to the level of configuration:
> - vlans
> - IGMP fast leave
> - stp
> - all other related to L1/L2 functions
> How much is that standardized ? What can be expected.
> 
> I undestand that L3 (POTS, wifi, router) will be vendor specific and 
> provisioning of this part may not be standardized.
> 
> As far now we have some experience with Corecess GEPON, but 
> interoperability here doesn't look good...
> 
> Regards,
> Marcin
> _______________________________________________
> redback-nsp mailing list
> redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/redback-nsp