[rbak-nsp] difference between 11.x and 12.x

[Заикин Станислав]

07.08.2013 17:27, Marcin Kuczera пишет:
>
>>> As between 11.x and 12.x is just 5 days difference, I don't think that
>>> this bug had been corrected.
>>> I rather suspect that that there is a difference in error handling, 
>>> i.e.
>>> if EU0 has problem with packet than ignore (drop) and continue instead
>>> of crash ???
>>> Or maybe I'am wrong ?
>>
>> Hello.
>>        We are faced with a similar problem.
>>        We have a lot ippa crash on seos 11.x, using the pppoe + enhanced
>>        nat. (se600 with 10ge-4-port linecards)
>>        On SEOS 12.1.1.2 was only 1 eppa crash (after 1 month uptime).
>>        On SEOS 12.1.1.4p1 aaad crashed after 5 days of work.
>>        Found a company that uses non dhcp clips + enhanced nat, they 
>> have
>>        ippa crash began after the nat logging enabling.
>>        You are using the enhanced nat? Nat logging?
>>
>> -- 
>> Vitaly
>
> Well, we have almost no nat. I mean - all subscribers have public IP 
> addresses
> and just a little, classical "bind interface" network uses NAT (office 
> purposes).
>
> PPA crashes are nasty as whole lincard reloads, just a XCRP process 
> crash is not a big deal as it recovers quickly...
>
> Regards,
> Marcin
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> redback-nsp mailing list
> redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/redback-nsp
>
Do you use vlan on-demand?
We have no crashes at 12.1.1.2 with many vlans on-demand (q-in-q) and 
week's crashes at 11.x.
But after moving to static vlans we have no crashes at 11.1.2.8 and 
11.1.2.7p3.

-- 
Заикин Станислав Евгеньевич
Системный администратор
Отдел эксплуатации и развития магистральной сети
Служба системного программного обеспечения
ОАО "Уфанет"