[rbak-nsp] Redback as a LAC
Yury Shefer
shefys at gmail.com
Wed Dec 10 23:12:30 EST 2014
Hello,
May I ask you to share yours access port/dot1q pvc/circuit configuration?
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Dermot Williams <
dermot.williams at imaginegroup.ie> wrote:
> Hi Soe,
>
> Not at present but I'm not expecting it to come up until I have my
> subscribers going into the right context.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dermot
>
> IP Engineering Manager
> Imagine Communications Group Ltd.
>
> On 10 December 2014 at 16:31, Soe Prapti <prapti.soe at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi William,
>>
>> Is your tunnel established ? example like this :
>>
>> show l2tp summary
>>
>> Context Name Peer Name Local Name Count Count
>> -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- ----- -----
>> local ABC 123
>> 1 0
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Dermot Williams <
>> dermot.williams at imaginegroup.ie> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> I have some subscribers coming in over PPPoE, some of whom I need to
>>> forward over an L2TP tunnel to an LNS on another provider's network. These
>>> subscribers are identified by their realm. I've got a context configured
>>> for this realm/domain - it's basically the same as the config outlined
>>> here:
>>> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/redback-nsp/2013-September/001576.html
>>>
>>> The problem I have is that when my test subscriber's PPPoE session comes
>>> into the local context, the Redback tries to authenticate against my RADIUS
>>> servers (which fails, obviously) instead of binding the subscriber to the
>>> context that I've defined for that domain.
>>>
>>> Is there something that I need to configure in the local context to make
>>> it bind sessions for these subscribers to the correct context?
>>>
>>>
--
Best regards,
Yury.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/redback-nsp/attachments/20141210/6293ff53/attachment.html>
More information about the redback-nsp
mailing list