From golem at mtm-info.pl  Thu Dec  6 06:35:23 2018
From: golem at mtm-info.pl (Rafal O.)
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 12:35:23 +0100
Subject: [rbak-nsp] syslogd messages
Message-ID: <163180146.20181206123523@mtm-info.pl>

Hello


How to access these messages and where are they stored ?

%LOG-4-EXT_MSGS: syslogd has received 12 external msgs


-- 
Pozdrowienia,
 Rafal O.


From lukasz at alfa-system.pl  Fri Dec 14 03:52:42 2018
From: lukasz at alfa-system.pl (=?UTF-8?Q?=c5=81ukasz_Kopiszka?=)
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 09:52:42 +0100
Subject: [rbak-nsp] BGP - neighbor peer-as
Message-ID: <94e2950e-c5e2-b624-4162-50006c31da7a@alfa-system.pl>

Hi,

I need to do something like this:

 ?router bgp 198050
 ? neighbor 192.168.12.184 internal
 ? neighbor 192.168.12.184 peer-as 65000
 ??? address-family ipv4 unicast
 ????? route-map wanguard-in in
 ????? route-map wanguard-out out

but unfortunately my SEOS-12.1.1.5p2-Release don't support such syntax 
"neighbor 192.168.12.184 peer-as 65000"

Is there any other way to do it?

-- 
Pozdrawiam,
?ukasz Kopiszka
http://alfa-system.pl


From me at geordish.org  Fri Dec 14 03:57:23 2018
From: me at geordish.org (Dave Bell)
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 08:57:23 +0000
Subject: [rbak-nsp] BGP - neighbor peer-as
In-Reply-To: <94e2950e-c5e2-b624-4162-50006c31da7a@alfa-system.pl>
References: <94e2950e-c5e2-b624-4162-50006c31da7a@alfa-system.pl>
Message-ID: <CACXVQYA-dsD5PH640tvo5gWrdrrndZbB=Jm4Si9pu7jDhWie8A@mail.gmail.com>

If you have a different AS number, it?s not an iBGP session. What are you
trying to accomplish?

On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 08:54, ?ukasz Kopiszka <lukasz at alfa-system.pl> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I need to do something like this:
>
>   router bgp 198050
>    neighbor 192.168.12.184 internal
>    neighbor 192.168.12.184 peer-as 65000
>      address-family ipv4 unicast
>        route-map wanguard-in in
>        route-map wanguard-out out
>
> but unfortunately my SEOS-12.1.1.5p2-Release don't support such syntax
> "neighbor 192.168.12.184 peer-as 65000"
>
> Is there any other way to do it?
>
> --
> Pozdrawiam,
> ?ukasz Kopiszka
> http://alfa-system.pl
>
> _______________________________________________
> redback-nsp mailing list
> redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/redback-nsp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/redback-nsp/attachments/20181214/0eb46589/attachment.html>

From dado at korolev-net.ru  Sun Dec 16 06:58:32 2018
From: dado at korolev-net.ru (Evgenii Davidov)
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 14:58:32 +0300
Subject: [rbak-nsp] se400 fan speed?
In-Reply-To: <c65f59fc-507f-5e75-0e1d-eed81b62b4e3@leon.pl>
References: <c65f59fc-507f-5e75-0e1d-eed81b62b4e3@leon.pl>
Message-ID: <20181216115832.GP81393@korolev-net.ru>


hello

is it possible to control fans's speed on se400?

it seems that they are not working sometimes

thanks

Fan Tray Status            Present
Fan(s) Status              Normal

N/A  fan tray             0C204210802995   20   4 22-JUN-2008 N/A      N/A

enterprises.2352.2.4.1.1.1.2.1 = "Fan Tray"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.1.1.4.1 = 1
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.2.1.2.1 = "Power Supply A"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.2.1.2.2 = "Power Supply B"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.2.1.4.1 = 1
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.2.1.4.2 = 3
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.2.11.1 = "1500mV voltage sensor, slot 1"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.2.11.2 = "1800mV voltage sensor, slot 1"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.2.11.3 = "2500mV voltage sensor, slot 1"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.2.11.4 = "3300mV voltage sensor, slot 1"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.2.22.1 = "1500mV voltage sensor, slot 4"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.2.22.2 = "1800mV voltage sensor, slot 4"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.2.22.3 = "2600mV voltage sensor, slot 4"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.2.22.4 = "3300mV voltage sensor, slot 4"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.2.24.1 = "1200mV voltage sensor, slot 6"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.2.24.2 = "1200mV voltage sensor, slot 6"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.2.24.3 = "1300mV voltage sensor, slot 6"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.2.24.4 = "1800mV voltage sensor, slot 6"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.2.24.5 = "2500mV voltage sensor, slot 6"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.2.24.6 = "3300mV voltage sensor, slot 6"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.2.24.7 = "12000mV voltage sensor, slot 6"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.2.24.8 = "900mV voltage sensor, slot 6"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.2.24.9 = "1500mV voltage sensor, slot 6"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.3.11.1 = Gauge32: 1500
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.3.11.2 = Gauge32: 1800
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.3.11.3 = Gauge32: 2500
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.3.11.4 = Gauge32: 3300
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.3.22.1 = Gauge32: 1500
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.3.22.2 = Gauge32: 1800
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.3.22.3 = Gauge32: 2600
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.3.22.4 = Gauge32: 3300
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.3.24.1 = Gauge32: 1200
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.3.24.2 = Gauge32: 1200
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.3.24.3 = Gauge32: 1300
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.3.24.4 = Gauge32: 1800
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.3.24.5 = Gauge32: 2500
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.3.24.6 = Gauge32: 3300
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.3.24.7 = Gauge32: 12000
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.3.24.8 = Gauge32: 900
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.3.24.9 = Gauge32: 1500
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.4.11.1 = Gauge32: 1513
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.4.11.2 = Gauge32: 1801
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.4.11.3 = Gauge32: 2480
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.4.11.4 = Gauge32: 3304
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.4.22.1 = Gauge32: 1513
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.4.22.2 = Gauge32: 1801
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.4.22.3 = Gauge32: 2574
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.4.22.4 = Gauge32: 3304
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.4.24.1 = Gauge32: 1176
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.4.24.2 = Gauge32: 1181
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.4.24.3 = Gauge32: 1284
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.4.24.4 = Gauge32: 1777
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.4.24.5 = Gauge32: 2465
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.4.24.6 = Gauge32: 3242
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.4.24.7 = Gauge32: 11938
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.4.24.8 = Gauge32: 876
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.3.1.4.24.9 = Gauge32: 1494
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.4.1.2.11.1 = "Temperature sensor on slot 1"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.4.1.2.22.1 = "Temperature sensor on slot 4"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.4.1.2.24.1 = "Temperature sensor on slot 6 - Processor"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.4.1.2.24.2 = "Temperature sensor on slot 6 - Exhaust Air"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.4.1.2.24.3 = "Temperature sensor on slot 6 - Inlet Air"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.4.1.2.29.1 = "Fan Tray Temperature sensor"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.4.1.3.11.1 = Gauge32: 58
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.4.1.3.22.1 = Gauge32: 60
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.4.1.3.24.1 = Gauge32: 53
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.4.1.3.24.2 = Gauge32: 38
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.4.1.3.24.3 = Gauge32: 35
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.4.1.3.29.1 = Gauge32: 0
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.6.1.2.11.1 = "Temperature sensor on slot 1"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.6.1.2.22.1 = "Temperature sensor on slot 4"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.6.1.2.24.1 = "Temperature sensor on slot 6 - Processor"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.6.1.2.24.2 = "Temperature sensor on slot 6 - Exhaust Air"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.6.1.2.24.3 = "Temperature sensor on slot 6 - Inlet Air"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.6.1.2.29.1 = "Fan Tray Temperature sensor"
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.6.1.3.11.1 = Gauge32: 58
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.6.1.3.22.1 = Gauge32: 60
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.6.1.3.24.1 = Gauge32: 53
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.6.1.3.24.2 = Gauge32: 38
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.6.1.3.24.3 = Gauge32: 35
enterprises.2352.2.4.1.6.1.3.29.1 = Gauge32: 0

-- 
Evgenii V Davidov

From lukasz at alfa-system.pl  Tue Dec 18 11:26:47 2018
From: lukasz at alfa-system.pl (=?UTF-8?Q?=c5=81ukasz_Kopiszka?=)
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:26:47 +0100
Subject: [rbak-nsp] BGP - neighbor peer-as
In-Reply-To: <94e2950e-c5e2-b624-4162-50006c31da7a@alfa-system.pl>
References: <94e2950e-c5e2-b624-4162-50006c31da7a@alfa-system.pl>
Message-ID: <d79b3d7b-4d18-8605-1f38-65ff26437d14@alfa-system.pl>

Problem solved:

 ? neighbor 192.168.12.184 external
 ??? remote-as 65000
 ??? address-family ipv4 unicast
 ????? route-map wanguard-in in
 ????? route-map wanguard-out out

-- 
Pozdrawiam,
?ukasz Kopiszka
http://alfa-system.pl


From lukasz at alfa-system.pl  Tue Dec 18 11:43:09 2018
From: lukasz at alfa-system.pl (=?UTF-8?Q?=c5=81ukasz_Kopiszka?=)
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:43:09 +0100
Subject: [rbak-nsp] BGP inaccessible next-hop
Message-ID: <7d62bfee-0108-f570-3587-f33d6ed9fbc2@alfa-system.pl>

Hi,

My lab config:

context BGP

 ?community-list REDIRECT
 ? seq 10 permit 65000:667

 ?route-map rm-in permit 200
 ? match community-list REDIRECT
 ? set ip next-hop 192.168.99.89

 ?route-map rm-out deny 10

 ? neighbor 192.168.12.184 external
 ??? remote-as 65000
 ??? address-family ipv4 unicast
 ????? route-map rm-in in
 ????? route-map rm-out out

 ?ip route 192.168.99.89/32 context FILTER

context FILTER

 ?interface int1
 ? ip address 192.168.99.89/30

 ?ip route 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.99.90


First step I'm marking IP 93.179.215.2 with community 6500:667

BGP#show bgp route 93.179.215.2/32
BGP ipv4 unicast routing table entry: 93.179.215.2/32, version 0
Paths: total 1, best path count 0, best peer 0.0.0.0
Not downloaded to RIB (no bestpath)
Not advertised to any peer

65000
 ? Nexthop 192.168.99.89 (inaccessible), peer 192.168.12.184 
(192.168.12.184), AS 65000
 ? Origin IGP, localpref 100, med 0, weight 100, external
 ? Community: 65000:667

Problem:
next-hop 192.168.99.89 is inaccessible


Question:
How can I solve issue with inaccessible next-hop to FILTER context?


PS: IP 192.168.99.90/30 is interface on PC with running tcpdump but 
there is no incomming traffic.


-- 
Pozdrawiam,
?ukasz Kopiszka
http://alfa-system.pl


From lukasz at alfa-system.pl  Tue Dec 18 11:43:09 2018
From: lukasz at alfa-system.pl (=?UTF-8?Q?=c5=81ukasz_Kopiszka?=)
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:43:09 +0100
Subject: [rbak-nsp] BGP inaccessible next-hop
Message-ID: <7d62bfee-0108-f570-3587-f33d6ed9fbc2@alfa-system.pl>

Hi,

My lab config:

context BGP

 ?community-list REDIRECT
 ? seq 10 permit 65000:667

 ?route-map rm-in permit 200
 ? match community-list REDIRECT
 ? set ip next-hop 192.168.99.89

 ?route-map rm-out deny 10

 ? neighbor 192.168.12.184 external
 ??? remote-as 65000
 ??? address-family ipv4 unicast
 ????? route-map rm-in in
 ????? route-map rm-out out

 ?ip route 192.168.99.89/32 context FILTER

context FILTER

 ?interface int1
 ? ip address 192.168.99.89/30

 ?ip route 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.99.90


First step I'm marking IP 93.179.215.2 with community 6500:667

BGP#show bgp route 93.179.215.2/32
BGP ipv4 unicast routing table entry: 93.179.215.2/32, version 0
Paths: total 1, best path count 0, best peer 0.0.0.0
Not downloaded to RIB (no bestpath)
Not advertised to any peer

65000
 ? Nexthop 192.168.99.89 (inaccessible), peer 192.168.12.184 
(192.168.12.184), AS 65000
 ? Origin IGP, localpref 100, med 0, weight 100, external
 ? Community: 65000:667

Problem:
next-hop 192.168.99.89 is inaccessible


Question:
How can I solve issue with inaccessible next-hop to FILTER context?


PS: IP 192.168.99.90/30 is interface on PC with running tcpdump but 
there is no incomming traffic.


-- 
Pozdrawiam,
?ukasz Kopiszka
http://alfa-system.pl


From me at geordish.org  Tue Dec 18 15:56:29 2018
From: me at geordish.org (Dave Bell)
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 20:56:29 +0000
Subject: [rbak-nsp] BGP inaccessible next-hop
In-Reply-To: <7d62bfee-0108-f570-3587-f33d6ed9fbc2@alfa-system.pl>
References: <7d62bfee-0108-f570-3587-f33d6ed9fbc2@alfa-system.pl>
Message-ID: <CACXVQYBwRSY-U4LJj-36xnJnZdg+_53_cZ8GF3Py04q2AcLXnw@mail.gmail.com>

Thats odd that this doesn't work, but I guess a BGP route can't recurse to
a static route for some reason?

Try an inter-context interface instead. That seems to work.

context BGP

  interface int2 intercontext p2p 1
   ip address 10.0.0.1/30

  community-list REDIRECT
   seq 10 permit 65000:667

  route-map rm-in permit 200
   match community-list REDIRECT
   set ip next-hop 10.0.0.2

  route-map rm-out deny 10

   neighbor 192.168.12.184 external
     remote-as 65000
     address-family ipv4 unicast
       route-map rm-in in
       route-map rm-out out

  ip route 192.168.99.89/32 context FILTER

context FILTER

  interface int1
   ip address 192.168.99.89/30

  interface int2 intercontext p2p 1
   ip address 10.0.0.2/30

  ip route 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.99.90

Dave



On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 16:44, ?ukasz Kopiszka <lukasz at alfa-system.pl> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> My lab config:
>
> context BGP
>
>   community-list REDIRECT
>    seq 10 permit 65000:667
>
>   route-map rm-in permit 200
>    match community-list REDIRECT
>    set ip next-hop 192.168.99.89
>
>   route-map rm-out deny 10
>
>    neighbor 192.168.12.184 external
>      remote-as 65000
>      address-family ipv4 unicast
>        route-map rm-in in
>        route-map rm-out out
>
>   ip route 192.168.99.89/32 context FILTER
>
> context FILTER
>
>   interface int1
>    ip address 192.168.99.89/30
>
>   ip route 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.99.90
>
>
> First step I'm marking IP 93.179.215.2 with community 6500:667
>
> BGP#show bgp route 93.179.215.2/32
> BGP ipv4 unicast routing table entry: 93.179.215.2/32, version 0
> Paths: total 1, best path count 0, best peer 0.0.0.0
> Not downloaded to RIB (no bestpath)
> Not advertised to any peer
>
> 65000
>    Nexthop 192.168.99.89 (inaccessible), peer 192.168.12.184
> (192.168.12.184), AS 65000
>    Origin IGP, localpref 100, med 0, weight 100, external
>    Community: 65000:667
>
> Problem:
> next-hop 192.168.99.89 is inaccessible
>
>
> Question:
> How can I solve issue with inaccessible next-hop to FILTER context?
>
>
> PS: IP 192.168.99.90/30 is interface on PC with running tcpdump but
> there is no incomming traffic.
>
>
> --
> Pozdrawiam,
> ?ukasz Kopiszka
> http://alfa-system.pl
>
> _______________________________________________
> redback-nsp mailing list
> redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/redback-nsp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/redback-nsp/attachments/20181218/fc831357/attachment.html>

From lukasz at alfa-system.pl  Tue Dec 18 22:16:45 2018
From: lukasz at alfa-system.pl (=?UTF-8?Q?=c5=81ukasz_Kopiszka?=)
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 04:16:45 +0100
Subject: [rbak-nsp] BGP inaccessible next-hop
In-Reply-To: <CACXVQYBwRSY-U4LJj-36xnJnZdg+_53_cZ8GF3Py04q2AcLXnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACXVQYBwRSY-U4LJj-36xnJnZdg+_53_cZ8GF3Py04q2AcLXnw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9d27824a-a95f-ae28-5978-6172a7a15d60@alfa-system.pl>

Nexthop is accessible but still no incomming traffic from redirected IP 
in FILTER context.

Probably I'm missing something in configuration which will pass traffic 
from redirected IP.


On FILTER context I try to "start shell" and tcpdump but there is no 
traffic from redirected IP.

Is there a other way to monitor specific interface than "start shell" 
and tcpdump?


-- 
Pozdrawiam,
?ukasz Kopiszka
https://alfa-system.pl


From S.Mikhaylovskiy at vconnect.ru  Wed Dec 19 06:36:24 2018
From: S.Mikhaylovskiy at vconnect.ru (Mikhaylovskiy Sergey)
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:36:24 +0000
Subject: [rbak-nsp] se1200 link-group  maximum-links
Message-ID: <ff9da6d8b5ef470da5f01c8413ffb045@nmaildb.vconnect.local>

Hello, there may be more than 8 ports in SE1200?

Table 15<http://localhost:9032/alexserv?ID=23016&fn=11_19082-CRA1191170_1Uen.S5.html#tbl-se-maximumlinks-MaxActiveArg> lists the range of values for the max-active argument when configuring an 802.1Q, Ethernet, or access link group with SmartEdge 100 native ports, FE and GE ports on media interface cards (MICs), or SmartEdge 400 and SmartEdge 800 traffic cards.
Table 15    Range of Values for max-active Argument

Port Type

Link Group Type

Range of Values

GE3, GE1020, 10GE

Access

1 to 2(1)<http://localhost:9032/alexserv?ID=23016&fn=11_19082-CRA1191170_1Uen.S5.html#tnote15-1>



Ethernet

1 to 8



802.1Q

1 to 8

FE, GE (all other versions)

Access

1 to 8



Ethernet

1 to 8



802.1Q

1 to 8


(1)  Configuring a value of 2 is subject to configuration restrictions. See the paragraph immediately following this table


? ?????????,

?????? ????????????
????? ???????? ????? ???????? ??????, ??????? ???????
?????? ???????? Virgin Connect

141092, ?????????? ???., ?. ???????, ???. ?????????, ??. ??????, 14?.

?: +7 (498) 300 39 65  ?: s.mikhaylovskiy at vconnect.ru<mailto:s.mikhaylovskiy at vconnect.ru>

Save paper! Don?t print / ???????? ???????! ?? ??????????????


[cid:image001.png at 01D497A8.4A830F30]


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/redback-nsp/attachments/20181219/2642a1d2/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6035 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/redback-nsp/attachments/20181219/2642a1d2/attachment-0001.png>

From brandonl at localtel.com  Wed Dec 19 09:30:51 2018
From: brandonl at localtel.com (Brandon Leeberg)
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 14:30:51 +0000
Subject: [rbak-nsp] se1200 link-group  maximum-links
In-Reply-To: <ff9da6d8b5ef470da5f01c8413ffb045@nmaildb.vconnect.local>
References: <ff9da6d8b5ef470da5f01c8413ffb045@nmaildb.vconnect.local>
Message-ID: <1dee46224dc64c0aad6a19cebcbc5167@localtel.com>

I would also like to know if an access link-group can have more than 2 in an SE1200. I?m thinking no, but it would be great?

From: redback-nsp [mailto:redback-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mikhaylovskiy Sergey
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 3:36 AM
To: 'redback-nsp at puck.nether.net' <redback-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [rbak-nsp] se1200 link-group maximum-links

Hello, there may be more than 8 ports in SE1200?

Table 15<http://localhost:9032/alexserv?ID=23016&fn=11_19082-CRA1191170_1Uen.S5.html#tbl-se-maximumlinks-MaxActiveArg> lists the range of values for the max-active argument when configuring an 802.1Q, Ethernet, or access link group with SmartEdge 100 native ports, FE and GE ports on media interface cards (MICs), or SmartEdge 400 and SmartEdge 800 traffic cards.
Table 15    Range of Values for max-active Argument

Port Type

Link Group Type

Range of Values

GE3, GE1020, 10GE

Access

1 to 2(1)<http://localhost:9032/alexserv?ID=23016&fn=11_19082-CRA1191170_1Uen.S5.html#tnote15-1>



Ethernet

1 to 8



802.1Q

1 to 8

FE, GE (all other versions)

Access

1 to 8



Ethernet

1 to 8



802.1Q

1 to 8


(1)  Configuring a value of 2 is subject to configuration restrictions. See the paragraph immediately following this table


? ?????????,

?????? ????????????
????? ???????? ????? ???????? ??????, ??????? ???????
?????? ???????? Virgin Connect

141092, ?????????? ???., ?. ???????, ???. ?????????, ??. ??????, 14?.

?: +7 (498) 300 39 65  ?: s.mikhaylovskiy at vconnect.ru<mailto:s.mikhaylovskiy at vconnect.ru>

Save paper! Don?t print / ???????? ???????! ?? ??????????????


[cid:image001.png at 01D49764.61C80810]


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/redback-nsp/attachments/20181219/8233d353/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6035 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/redback-nsp/attachments/20181219/8233d353/attachment-0001.png>