<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
margin-top:0cm;
margin-right:0cm;
margin-bottom:0cm;
margin-left:36.0pt;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=FR link=blue vlink=purple><p><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial>
I'm not 100% sure because ip addressing is hidden in your config but anyway...<br>Your clients fail to bind without last-resort because ip address given by radius is not within subnet of any 'normal' multibind interfaces of context.<br>If ip address assignment goes from radius then SmartEdge does lookup through subnets of all multibind interfaces. If lookup fails then binding fails too until you have last-resort.<br><br>HIH<br>/denis </font></p>
<p><hr size=2 width="100%" align=center tabindex=-1>
<font face=Tahoma size=2>
<b>From</b>: Greg GOUDOU <greg.goudou@gmail.com>
<br><b>To</b>: Denis Mikhaylovskiy; redback-nsp@puck.nether.net <redback-nsp@puck.nether.net>
<br><b>Sent</b>: Sat Apr 17 11:36:31 2010<br><b>Subject</b>: RE: [rbak-nsp] problem of authentification on last-resort interface
<br></font></p>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#1F497D'>Hi <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#1F497D'>Thanks for your
answer. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#1F497D'>I don’t understand
why, when I configure the both interfaces into multibind, (without last resort)
, neither the client1 nor the client2 cannot authenticate.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#1F497D'>Whereas when I configure
one of them into the multibind lastresort, the both can authenticate but they
have bound to the same interface.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#1F497D'> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#1F497D'>Regards, <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#1F497D'>Grégory <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:
"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>De :</span></b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Denis Mikhaylovskiy
[mailto:denis.mikhaylovskiy@ericsson.com] <br>
<b>Envoyé :</b> samedi 17 avril 2010 04:2</span><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>1<br>
<b>À :</b> 'greg.goudou@gmail.com'; 'redback-nsp@puck.nether.net'<br>
<b>Objet :</b> Re: [rbak-nsp] problem of authentification on last-resort
interface<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:navy'>Hi,<br>
It is not possible to have more than one last-resort interface by design in
context.<br>
Actually SmartEdge doesn't pass clients through multibind interfaces at all :).
<br>
<br>
As per 'show subs active' output I can conclude that both clients got fixed ip
assignment by raidus. And I do not understand what is the problem.<br>
<br>
<br>
/denis</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center>
</span></div>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>:
redback-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net <br>
<b>To</b>: redback-nsp@puck.nether.net <br>
<b>Sent</b>: Fri Apr 16 11:22:01 2010<br>
<b>Subject</b>: [rbak-nsp] problem of authentification on last-resort interface
</span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Hi, <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>I meet a problem about a
configuration. I cannot create in a same context, 2 multibind last-resort
interfaces.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>But, I already have a PPPoE client
connected in this context (we will called “context A”). Below, his
configuration: <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='background:lime;mso-highlight:lime'>Context
A vpn-rd XXXX:6<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='background:lime;mso-highlight:lime'>interface
Loop_client1 loopback<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='background:lime;mso-highlight:lime'>
ip address A.B.C.D/32</span><span lang=EN-US> with A.B.C.D/32 is a public IP
address<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='background:lime;mso-highlight:lime'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='background:lime;mso-highlight:lime'>interface
PPP-client1 <span style='color:red'>multibind lastresort</span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='background:lime;mso-highlight:lime'> ip
unnumbered Loop_client1</span><span lang=EN-US><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>the second client is configured as defined
below : <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='background:yellow;mso-highlight:
yellow'>Context A vpn-rd XXXX:6<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='background:yellow;mso-highlight:
yellow'>interface Loop_client2 loopback<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='background:yellow;mso-highlight:
yellow'> ip address A.B.F.G/32</span><span lang=EN-US> with A.B.F.G/32 is
a public IP address<span style='background:yellow;mso-highlight:yellow'> <o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='background:yellow;mso-highlight:
yellow'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='background:yellow;mso-highlight:
yellow'>interface PPP-client2 multibind<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='background:yellow;mso-highlight:
yellow'> ip unnumbered Loop_client2</span><span lang=EN-US><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>when we verify the state of the connection
of the clients, we notice : <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>For client 1: <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><a href="mailto:client1@realm.xx">client1@realm.xx</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>
Agent Remote ID "client1"<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>
Circuit 4/8 vlan-id 426 pppoe 21240<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>
Internal Circuit 4/8:1023:63/6/2/44395<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>
Interface bound <span style='background:lime;mso-highlight:lime'>PPP-client1</span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>
Current port-limit unlimited<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>
context-name A (applied)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>
dns primary X.X.X.X (applied)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>
dns secondary Y.Y.Y.Y (applied)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>
ip address A.B.C.D (applied)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>
forward policy in FORWARD_FIRSTBOOT (applied)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>For client2, I receive this state of
connection:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><a href="mailto:client2@realm.xx">client2@realm.xx</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>
Agent Remote ID "Client2"<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>
Circuit 4/8 vlan-id 401 pppoe 16731<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>
Internal Circuit 4/8:1023:63/6/2/34556<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>
Interface bound <span style='background:lime;mso-highlight:lime'>PPP-client1</span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>
Current port-limit unlimited<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>
context-name A (applied)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>
dns primary X.X.X.X (applied)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>
dns secondary Y.Y.Y.Y (applied)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>
ip address A.B.F.G (applied)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>
forward policy in FORWARD_FIRSTBOOT (applied)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>Therefore, I would like these clients have
each of them, a public IP address and pass through their own interface bound. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>If somebody have a solution, let me know. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>Regards, <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>gOOdman<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>