<div dir="ltr">You may try to check "end-point independent" command under nat policy ... enhanced. Maybe it is what you're looking for:<div><br></div><div><div>[local]SE1200(config-policy-nat)#?</div><div> abort Abort this configuration - backout from running config</div><div> access-group Define access-group to classify dynamic NAT</div><div> admission-control Configure connection admission control</div><div> commit Commit configuration transactions to running config</div><div> connections Define connection admission control parameters</div><div> destination Configure to overwrite destination IP address</div><div> drop Configure to drop not classified traffic</div><div> endpoint-independent Set endpoint-indepenent traffic mode <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<</div></div><div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 2:47 AM, Wojciech Wrona <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:w0jtas@w0jtas.com" target="_blank">w0jtas@w0jtas.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
UPDATE: This was only half success. Broadcom based routers on more
heavy load will open more than one TCP connection from the same
source port. This will be dropped by Redback NAT implementation. For
now i have do idea how to deal with it :(<br>
<br>
Best regards,<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<pre cols="72">--
w0jtas
</pre>
<div>W dniu 26.10.2015 o 18:38, Wojciech
Wrona pisze:<br>
</div></font></span><div><div class="h5">
<blockquote type="cite">
Hi again. <br>
<br>
It seems like i've solved the problem, so i'm posting it here for
future use. Routers like Pentagram, Netgear and some other clones
(mailnly based on broadcom router on the chip chipset) are using
strange but the most efficient NAT immplementation. <br>
<br>
If your subscribers are using theese routers as CPE, and you're
NATing them and using not enhanced NAT on Your redback (becouse of
lack of microblocks at the line cards as we are, or maybe becouse
of lack of license but its less possible i think), you will have
experience the same problem. <br>
<br>
On every "normall" (Linux based) NAT implementation source ports
for outgoing connections are used in always growing manner.
Starting from port 1025 up to 65536 and then again from 1025 ....
Broadcom want to be super efficient (dont know why - its only home
class router), and it is doing it in a different way. Couple
seconds after closing TCP connection, its source port can be
reused again for another one, it is not waiting with reuse for
hitting the 65536 limit. I don't know what is the time limit (if
there is any) for the reuse, but in my tests i didnt see any port
reuse in time shorter than 10-12 seconds. <br>
<br>
The problem is that Redback has default timeout for FIN-RESET set
to 240 seconds. During this time this connection is considered
still open, so any other SYN packet sent from the same source port
is considered TCP P2MP connection attempt. Which (as u probably
know) is prohibited in not enhanced nat.<br>
<br>
Therefore the only solution for those routers is to set Redback
FIN-RESET timeout to its minimal value (4 seconds) in nat policy.
I'm not sure if it solved the problem in 100% (still i can imagine
port reuse in 2 or 3 seconds after TCP connection close), but in
my user experience tests (10 firefox tabs constantly loading, and
refreshing pages) everything worked well. IMO its more than enough
:)<br>
<br>
<tt> nat policy publicNatPolicy</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>! Default class</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> drop</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> icmp-notification</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>! Named classes</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> access-group publicNatAccess</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> class NAT</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> pool publicNatIP userAccess</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> timeout tcp 7200</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> timeout udp 120</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> timeout fin-reset 4</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> endpoint-independent filtering udp</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> inbound-refresh udp</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> icmp-notification</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> class IGNORE</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> ignore</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> inbound-refresh udp</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> icmp-notification</tt><tt><br>
</tt><br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
<pre cols="72">--
w0jtas
</pre>
<div>W dniu 23.10.2015 o 14:48, Wojciech
Wrona pisze:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div style="font-family:-moz-fixed;font-size:12px" lang="x-unicode">
<pre>Hi guys,
I'm struggling for some days with strange issue on Redback. I have
services configured as CLIPS based on DHCP/Radius auth. Everything works
fine besides NAT. When the connecting host is normal single PC (as a
subscriber) it looks ok, but when i connect a router (some Pentagram
P6362 - becouse those were tested) and that single PC is connected after
this router, here comes the situation where double NAT is going on. It
should work fine, when IP addressed in both network are not overlaping,
and i'm sure that they're not. But when pentagram is connected there is
a trouble with opening more than few TCP connections. After opening few
of them (rather random but small value) another SYN packets are lost
(sent to redback, but no answer is received). It happens only when using
a harware home router (like pentagram or something else), but when i
connect in this place another PC with 2 network interfaces and Linux on
board which is doing as second NAT box, the problem is not seen.
What could cause this ? I have no idea where to start.
My tests i'm doing at biuroInside interface
<b>My config below:</b>
context userAccess
!
no ip domain-lookup
nat fragments
!
!
ip nat pool publicNatIP napt multibind
address <a href="http://188.122.20.96/32" target="_blank">188.122.20.96/32</a>
exclude well-known
!
nat policy publicNatPolicy
! Default class
drop
icmp-notification
! Named classes
access-group publicNatAccess
class NAT
pool publicNatIP userAccess
timeout tcp 7200
timeout udp 60
endpoint-independent filtering udp
inbound-refresh udp
icmp-notification
class IGNORE
ignore
inbound-refresh udp
icmp-notification
!
interface biuroInside multibind
ip address <a href="http://192.168.129.254/24" target="_blank">192.168.129.254/24</a>
dhcp server interface
ip access-group vlan2000Security out
!
interface radiusIf
ip address <a href="http://10.0.0.2/30" target="_blank">10.0.0.2/30</a>
ip source-address radius
!
interface tichyWiFi multibind
ip address <a href="http://192.168.128.1/26" target="_blank">192.168.128.1/26</a>
dhcp server interface
ip arp secured-arp
no logging console
!
ip access-list adminAccess
seq 10 permit udp any any eq rip
seq 20 permit tcp any any eq bgp
seq 30 permit icmp any
seq 40 permit udp any any eq bootps
seq 50 permit udp any eq 1812 any
seq 60 permit tcp any any established
!
ip access-list vlan2000Security
seq 10 permit ip 188.122.17.32 0.0.0.31 any
seq 20 deny tcp any any eq 135
seq 30 deny tcp any any eq 139
seq 40 deny tcp any any eq 445
seq 50 deny tcp any any eq www
seq 60 deny tcp any any eq 8080
seq 70 deny tcp any any eq 443
seq 80 deny tcp any any eq lpd
seq 90 deny tcp any any eq 631
seq 100 deny tcp any any eq 9100
seq 110 permit ip any any
!
policy access-list publicNatAccess
seq 10 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.63.255 host 188.122.20.1 class IGNORE
seq 20 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.63.255 host 188.122.20.3 class IGNORE
seq 30 permit ip 192.168.129.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.191.0 0.0.0.255 class
IGNORE
seq 40 permit ip 192.168.129.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.192.0 0.0.31.255
class IGNORE
seq 50 permit ip 192.168.129.0 0.0.0.255 188.122.17.32 0.0.0.31 class
IGNORE
seq 60 permit ip 192.168.129.0 0.0.0.255 host 188.122.20.36 class IGNORE
seq 70 permit ip 192.168.129.0 0.0.0.255 host 188.122.20.1 class IGNORE
seq 80 permit ip 192.168.129.0 0.0.0.255 host 188.122.20.12 class IGNORE
seq 90 permit ip 192.168.129.0 0.0.0.255 host 192.168.129.254 class IGNORE
seq 100 permit ip 192.168.129.0 0.0.0.255 host 188.122.18.122 class IGNORE
seq 110 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 class NAT
!
aaa authentication administrator local
aaa authentication administrator maximum sessions 1
aaa authentication subscriber radius
ip pool options use-class-c-bcast-addrs
!
radius server 10.0.0.1 encrypted-key <key_cut_off>
radius attribute nas-port-id format physical
!
subscriber default
ip source-validation
nat policy-name publicNatPolicy
!
ip route <a href="http://0.0.0.0/0" target="_blank">0.0.0.0/0</a> context local
service ftp client
service ssh client
service telnet client
!
admin-access-group adminAccess in
!
dhcp server policy
nak-on-subnet-deletion
option domain-name-server 188.122.20.9 8.8.8.8
option domain-name <a href="http://finemedia.pl" target="_blank">finemedia.pl</a>
option ntp-server 188.122.20.1
option tftp-server-name <a href="http://finemedia.pl" target="_blank">finemedia.pl</a>
default-lease-time 3600
subnet <a href="http://192.168.128.0/26" target="_blank">192.168.128.0/26</a> name tichyWiFi
range 192.168.128.2 192.168.128.62
option router 192.168.128.1
subnet <a href="http://192.168.129.0/24" target="_blank">192.168.129.0/24</a> name biuroInside
range 192.168.129.50 192.168.129.253
option router 192.168.129.254
!
!
!
end
<b>
My clips config goes like this:</b>
dot1q profile dot1qCLIPS
radius attribute nas-port-type 15
port ethernet 1/4
description SE600Downlink_10G
no shutdown
encapsulation dot1q
dot1q pvc 2000 profile dot1qCLIPS
service clips dhcp context userAccess
Best regards,
<div>--
w0jtas
</div></pre>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
redback-nsp mailing list
<a href="mailto:redback-nsp@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">redback-nsp@puck.nether.net</a>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/redback-nsp" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/redback-nsp</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
redback-nsp mailing list
<a href="mailto:redback-nsp@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">redback-nsp@puck.nether.net</a>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/redback-nsp" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/redback-nsp</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
redback-nsp mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:redback-nsp@puck.nether.net">redback-nsp@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/redback-nsp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/redback-nsp</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Best regards,<br>Yury.</div></div>
</div></div>