[scg-sec] Worth our time? FW: Invitation: Workshop on Datasets
for Network Security
Jared Mauch
jared at puck.nether.net
Mon Jan 12 09:41:19 EST 2004
On Jan 12, 2004, at 12:12 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Jared Mauch wrote:
>> Barry, (i was thinking about calling you about this anyways ..)
>> I'm a bit concerned that the desire by DHS to create as is called
>> "national-level" testbeds will exclude those providers that have
>> built a network with the global perspective in mind as opposed to
>> those
>> that are only concerned with "protecting our national interests".
>
> I'm getting a lot of requests for data about, on and sniffed from
> our networks.
>
> Extending CALEA to ISPs, establishing a national early warning
> cyber-monitoring center, collecting large scale test sets for
> product evaluations.
>
> How does this help ISPs?
>
I think it doesn't. Lists such as nsp-sec where there are DHS reps,
they glean "intelligence" from the list and they never provide any such
data back. No aggregated data either.
I think the key is that they appear to have nothing to offer and
everything to take. A very worrying situation to me. I don't know
what others think, but I don't like being involved in parasitic
situations. If there is something (of value) they can offer.
- Jared
More information about the scg-sec
mailing list