[scg-sec] updated key ring

[Smith, Donald]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Leo, your key expired. I signed Pauls key here is a new copy of the key ring.


Donald.Smith at qwest.com GCIA
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xAF00EDCC
I reserve the right to be wrong but don't exercise it too often.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: scg-sec-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:scg-sec-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Smith, Donald
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 10:05 AM
> To: bgreene at cisco.com; scg-sec at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [scg-sec] Cisco's Secondary
> 
> 
> 
> *** PGP Signature Status: good
> *** Signer: donald.smith <donald.smith at qwest.com> 
> *** Signed: 1/28/04 10:04:31 AM
> *** Verified: 1/28/04 10:16:11 AM
> *** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
> 
> I agree. A vendor contact on the "inside" the is not an 
> ex-ISPer is better then no contact.
> 
> 
> Donald.Smith at qwest.com GCIA
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xAF00EDCC
> I reserve the right to be wrong but don't exercise it too often.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: scg-sec-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > [mailto:scg-sec-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Barry Greene
> > (bgreene)
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 9:18 AM
> > To: scg-sec at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [scg-sec] Cisco's Secondary
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > *** PGP Signature Status: good
> > *** Signer: Barry Raveendran Greene <bgreene at cisco.com> 
> > *** Signed: 1/28/04 9:10:13 AM
> > *** Verified: 1/28/04 9:38:03 AM
> > *** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
> > 
> > Hello Everyone,
> > 
> > Originally, the "vendor rep" idea was to have ex-ISPer 
> > industry reps as the primary/secondary contacts. That didn't 
> > work out so well. For example, Vince Fuller is still not in a 
> > central position in Cisco to act as a escalation trigger if 
> > things get really hot. So I would like to suggest that we 
> > drop the "industry rep/ex-ISPer" requirement. We kinda did 
> > this already to get Paul on. Plus, talking with Paul it seems 
> > like the next logical secondary for Juniper (i.e. someone 
> > with his span of control to pull in) would be one of his 
> > direct colleagues in development. 
> > 
> > Q. Are people Ok with this?
> > 
> > If yes, I would like to nominate Wendy Garvin 
> > [wgarvin at cisco.com] from Cisco's PSIRT as Cisco's secondary.
> > 
> > Barry
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > *** END PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > scg-sec mailing list
> > scg-sec at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/scg-sec
> > 
> 
> 
> *** END PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
> 
> _______________________________________________
> scg-sec mailing list
> scg-sec at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/scg-sec
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.8

iQA/AwUBQBfuo0PxB2evAO3MEQLtWwCg4PrxFPCb1IOb2RhvG8rz4QV9oTwAoMp/
ovPlVjrf8duU4mAPBtGNIyOD
=4iVH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Exported PGP Key(s).asc
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 26884 bytes
Desc: Exported PGP Key(s).asc
Url : https://puck.nether.net/mailman/private/scg-sec/attachments/20040128/3eea4576/ExportedPGPKeys-0001.obj