[VoiceOps] Geographic redundancy

Kenny Sallee kenny.sallee at gmail.com
Tue Aug 11 10:36:48 EDT 2009

My 'tone' in email is somtimes misinterpreted (so sorry about that) - I was
just 'thinking out loud' as I like to put it.

One thing you did mention is that telco's don't like the move to IP - what
are their arguments against it?

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com>wrote:

> I didn't say that the presence of IP removes all the complexity, nor that
> interconnection without TDM and/or SS7 is possible--at least, for CLECs, but
> also many ITSPs that buy TDM in order to do access that is actually reliable
> and interoperable.
> My intended point, which should have perhaps been made clearer, was only
> that the use of more IP - where feasible and practical - in the place of a
> circuit-switched alternative can add fluidity to the network that can change
> the CAPEX formula for redundancy in a more favourable direction.
> It's not magic and it certainly won't solve all the problems that motivate
> the original question.
> --
> Alex Balashov
> Evariste Systems
> Web    : http://www.evaristesys.com/
> Tel    : (+1) (678) 954-0670
> Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
> Mobile : (+1) (678) 237-1775
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20090811/423777d3/attachment.html>

More information about the VoiceOps mailing list