[VoiceOps] SMS apps, providers, and peers
Alex Balashov
abalashov at evaristesys.com
Tue Dec 8 12:37:08 EST 2009
Carlos Alvarez wrote:
> Sounds great, and is very logical. I said the same thing about fax ten
> years ago. Today we (the entire telecom community) are wasting huge
> amounts of time/money/resources in order to support this dead
> technology. What makes you think SMS will be any different?
Excellent question! I'm not sure. But I'm also not sure that's a very
apples-to-oranges comparison.
A lot of the remaining backstop for fax has to do with the preeminence
of the written signature as the mark of legal validity. Until we come
up with a good, universal way to electronically "sign" documents and law
evolves to acknowledge it, I don't think the inertia behind fax will go
away, even in industries where it continues to be used for reasons that
are superficially very tangential to this. Also, the alternatives
offered to users of fax by the vanguard of new technologies don't really
add much new functionality, while striking people accustomed to it as
cumbersome. Something about a scanner, saving files, attaching them to
emails... yes, I know they're ultra-fast-acting document scanners and
accompanying desktop software has made the process relatively turn-key,
but it's still easier to just sign the page and put it in the fax
machine. The same basic result is accomplished.
The distinction between SMS and its prospective replacement is far wider
and more pronounced, AND the reason SMS continues to dominate on phones
capable of more (that is, aside from its ubiquity) is pretty much
completely related to deliberate manipulation/coercion. It has very
little intrinsic technological merit. That is why I think it will be
different.
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
More information about the VoiceOps
mailing list