[VoiceOps] Transnexus LCR
scott at sberkman.net
Fri May 7 10:07:19 EDT 2010
We actually used to use them very much like a class 4 switch to control
routing in our H.323 network (Gatekeeper functionality really). There are a
lot of routing and such functions you can use the platform for, but today we
just use the LCR piece.
From: Peter Childs [mailto:PChilds at internode.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 9:26 PM
To: Scott Berkman
Cc: anorexicpoodle; Tim Donahue; voiceops at voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Transnexus LCR
So from looking at the website it looks like you could use OpenSIPS+OSPrey
as a 'Class 4 Softswitch' or tandem switch... so you could place it
somewhere in your core with your class-5 softswitches around the edge???
Hence all your 'off-net' routing/carrier-billing is done in your 'Class 4'
and your 'Class 5's end up with some simplistic tables... (?)
On 07/05/2010, at 3:30 AM, Scott Berkman wrote:
> We also use TransNexus for CDR and are very happy with the product and
support. They are local to us and we have a very good relationship with
> One of the best things about them is their flexibility and willingness to
develop the system(s) to add functions you need if they see it as a benefit
to their overall offerings.
> If you have any more specific questions feel free to contact me off list.
> From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org]
On Behalf Of anorexicpoodle
> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 1:03 PM
> To: Tim Donahue
> Cc: voiceops at voiceops.org
> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Transnexus LCR
> I am running both and have been for years.
> AcmePacket is the leader in the SBC market for a good reason, their
product is IMO the best out there, and their TAC and SE team has always been
a pleasure to work with.
> TransNexus is a solid product and is about the best solution I have found
for gracefully handling routing tables of staggering size, additionally they
have a fantastic team over there and are always a pleasure to work with.
> Really, and this is pretty unusual, i don't have any serious negative
criticism about either product or the total solution.
> Good luck
> On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 11:56 -0400, Tim Donahue wrote:
> Hi all,
> We are looking LCR packages to deploy as we plan the replacement our
existing Netrake SBCs. The current front-runner for the replacement SBC is
> We found the LCR software from Transnexus, which according to their
website, should be able to work with both our existing infrastructure and
our future upgrade. I was wondering if anyone has any experience (good, bad
or other) with Transnexus LCR or SDReporter packages they would be willing
to share (on or off-list relpies are welcome) with us.
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
More information about the VoiceOps