[VoiceOps] Question about Packet Jitter
Schwarz, Albrecht (Albrecht)
albrecht.schwarz at alcatel-lucent.com
Fri Oct 29 08:52:29 EDT 2010
VoIP performance experts should be familiar with
- ITU-T Y.1541 concerning IPDV (IP packet delay variation = jitter); there are many sections on IPDV, particularily also on "aggregated PDV";
- IETF PMOL, ... IP performance metrics
- IETF AVT, ... RFC's for RTCP XR (RFC 3611, 5093) and ietf drafts on work in progress RTCP XR metrics
-Albrecht
> -----Original Message-----
> From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org
> [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Jim Dalton
> Sent: Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010 14:15
> To: 'David Knell'; voiceops at voiceops.org
> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Question about Packet Jitter
>
> > Jitter is an average measure of what's essentially noise (random
> > variations in the arrival times of packets from a mean), and so I'd
> > expect - for two jitter sources in series producing average
> jitter of
> > j1 and j2 respectively - the overall jitter to be sqrt(j1^2 + j2^2).
> >
> > Intuitively, a packet which is late as a result of the first jitter
> > source might then be further delayed or delivered early by
> the second
> > - so just summing the average jitter values isn't appropriate.
> >
> > --Dave
>
> [JD wrote:] Very good point. The relationship of overall jitter to be
> sqrt(j1^2 + j2^2) makes sense. However, I am having trouble
> working through a proof of the math. Any suggestions of a
> reference on jitter that might address this?
>
> Many thanks for your insight,
>
> Jim D.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org [mailto:voiceops-
> > bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of David Knell
> > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 1:37 AM
> > To: voiceops at voiceops.org
> > Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Question about Packet Jitter
> >
> > On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:26 -0400, Scott Berkman wrote:
> > > The only portion missing is the jitter through the SBC
> itself, which
> > really
> > > should be negligible. Assuming that is 0, your equation
> below would
> > be
> > > correct.
> >
> > I think I'd disagree with this. Jitter is an average measure of
> > what's essentially noise (random variations in the arrival times of
> > packets from a mean), and so I'd expect - for two jitter sources in
> > series producing average jitter of j1 and j2 respectively - the
> > overall jitter to be sqrt(j1^2 + j2^2).
> >
> > Intuitively, a packet which is late as a result of the first jitter
> > source might then be further delayed or delivered early by
> the second
> > - so just summing the average jitter values isn't appropriate.
> >
> > --Dave
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org [mailto:voiceops-
> > bounces at voiceops.org]
> > > On Behalf Of Jim Dalton
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 8:34 AM
> > > To: voiceops at voiceops.org
> > > Subject: [VoiceOps] Question about Packet Jitter
> > >
> > > I have a question about calculating jitter. Consider the call
> > diagram
> > > below.
> > > A SIP call flows from the source device to the Session Border
> > Controller
> > > (SBC)
> > > to the destination device. All RTP packets are proxied
> through the
> > SBC.
> > >
> > > +========+ +=====+
> > +=============+
> > > | Source | Ingress Call Leg | SBC | Egress Call Leg |
> > > | Destination
> > |
> > > | Device |------------------->| |------------------>| Device
> > |
> > > +========+ +=====+
> > +=============+
> > > Jitter Src to SBC
> > > ------------------->
> > >
> > > Jitter Source to Destination
> > > --------------------------------------------->
> > >
> > > If the packet jitter is known for the Ingress Call Leg from the
> > source to
> > > SBC and for end to end packet flow from the source to the
> > destination, is it
> > > possible to calculate jitter for the Egress Call Leg from
> the SBC to
> > the
> > > destination device?
> > >
> > > I do not think the following relationship is accurate.
> > > (jitter Source to Destination) less (jitter Src to SBC) = (jitter
> > > SBC
> > to
> > > Destination)
> > >
> > > Can anyone provide some guidance on this question?
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > Jim Dalton
> > > VoIP Least Cost Routing, Analysis, Billing
> > > 1.404.526.6053
> > > www.TransNexus.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > VoiceOps mailing list
> > > VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > VoiceOps mailing list
> > > VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
> > >
> >
> > --
> > David Knell, Director, 3C Limited
> > T: +44 20 3298 2000
> > E: dave at 3c.co.uk
> > W: http://www.3c.co.uk
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > VoiceOps mailing list
> > VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
More information about the VoiceOps
mailing list