[VoiceOps] response code mapping to upstream peers
ryandelgrosso at gmail.com
Tue Apr 10 18:50:30 EDT 2012
I actually do quite a bit of this.
Metaswitch has a tendency to return 502 messages when what people
actually want to see is a 503, 486, or 480 (depending on the case and
direction of the call and if route advancing is desired or not). I also
use this to sanitize things a tad on my access side.
On 04/09/2012 01:33 PM, David Hiers wrote:
> Does anyone do any response code mapping on the peer side? You can
> deny information to attackers by changing you codes from the default
> (turn a BUSY HERE into a BAD GATEWAY, at the SBC, for instance), and
> I'm wondering if anyone has found a good reason to do so.
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
More information about the VoiceOps