[VoiceOps] Acme Packet/Broadsoft/ENUM

Robert Dawson RDawson at alliedtelecom.net
Thu Jan 5 18:05:29 EST 2012


Once again, thanks. I was just far enough off that it would have failed miserably :)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Thompson [mailto:timthompson at nicodem.us]
> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 6:03 PM
> To: Robert Dawson
> Cc: voiceops at voiceops.org
> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Acme Packet/Broadsoft/ENUM
> 
> Yessir:
> 
> session-group
>         group-name                     NetSrvr
>         description                    Broadsoft_NetGroup
>         state                          enabled
>         app-protocol                   SIP
>         strategy                       Hunt
>         dest
>                                        net1.bs.sip
>                                        net2.bs.sip
> 
> session-group
>         group-name                     NetSrvr2
>         description                    Broadsoft_NetGroup
>         state                          enabled
>         app-protocol                   SIP
>         strategy                       Hunt
>         dest
>                                        net2.bs.sip
>                                        net1.bs.sip
> 
> Make sure if you go the SAG route, that enum-sag-match is enabled in
> the
> sip-config on the SD, else it won't match back to the SAG.
> 
> -Tim
> 
> On 01/05/2012 02:59 PM, Robert Dawson wrote:
> > Perfect - thanks again.
> >
> > Just to clarify, NetSrvr and NetSrvr2 are the actual names of the
> SAGs on the AP?
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Tim Thompson [mailto:timthompson at nicodem.us]
> >> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 5:51 PM
> >> To: Robert Dawson
> >> Cc: voiceops at voiceops.org
> >> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Acme Packet/Broadsoft/ENUM
> >>
> >> We also use powerdns, but use the pipe backend to pass it through
> some
> >> in-house code, which is itself backended by oracle. This works more
> or
> >> less the same, but you gain some additional control via the pipe
> >> backend.
> >>
> >> Here's the results of a 'show enum lookup'. DNs and FQDNs have been
> >> changed to protect the innocent.
> >>
> >> Enum Lookup Result:
> >> Query Name -->
> >>         +9165551212
> >> Answers -->
> >>         sip:+19165551212 at NetSrvr ttl= 120
> >>         sip:+19165551212 at NetSrvr2 ttl= 120
> >>
> >> And the associated cache-entry:
> >> Query-->
> >>         Q:NAPTR 2.1.2.1.5.5.5.6.1.9.tld ttl=48
> >> Answers-->
> >>
> >>            order=50 pref=1 "u" "E2U+sip"
> >> "!^.*$!sip:+19165551212 at NetSrvr!" ""
> >>
> >>            order=50 pref=2 "u" "E2U+sip"
> >> "!^.*$!sip:+19165551212 at NetSrvr2!" ""
> >>
> >> The same query via dig:
> >>
> >> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> >> 2.1.2.1.5.5.5.6.1.9.tld. 120 IN NAPTR 50 1 "u" "E2U+sip"
> >> "!^.*$!sip:+19165551212 at NetSrvr!" .
> >> 2.1.2.1.5.5.5.6.1.9.tld. 120 IN NAPTR 50 2 "u" "E2U+sip"
> >> "!^.*$!sip:+19165551212 at NetSrvr2!" .
> >>
> >>
> >> Both NetSrvr and NetSrvr2 are SAGs, with the two netservers'
> >> session-agents in reverse orders, per best practices. (i.e.
> Net1/Net2,
> >> Net2/Net1.)
> >>
> >> Hope this helps,
> >> -Tim
> >>
> >>
> >> On 01/05/2012 02:19 PM, Robert Dawson wrote:
> >>> Sure, anything would be helpful. I am using powerdns with a mysql
> >> backend, sounds similar to your setup.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Rob
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org [mailto:voiceops-
> >>>> bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Tim Thompson
> >>>> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 4:01 PM
> >>>> To: voiceops at voiceops.org
> >>>> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Acme Packet/Broadsoft/ENUM
> >>>>
> >>>> Rob,
> >>>>
> >>>> We use a custom in-house ENUM solution that queries a database in
> >> real
> >>>> time, so I can't offer you an actual zone snippet. I could give
> some
> >>>> examples of what 'show enum lookup' or dig would return, if that
> >> would
> >>>> be helpful.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Tim
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 01/05/2012 11:12 AM, Robert Dawson wrote:
> >>>>> Is anyone using ENUM with their Acme/BS deployment that wouldn't
> >> mind
> >>>>> sharing a snippet of their zone file showing the proper record
> >>>>> configuration?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Rob
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> VoiceOps mailing list
> >>>>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> >>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> VoiceOps mailing list
> >>>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
> >




More information about the VoiceOps mailing list