[VoiceOps] 911 address policy for company phones at home

Ryan Delgrosso ryandelgrosso at gmail.com
Sun Jan 20 14:47:16 EST 2013


We have been using 911Enable now for 6+ years and have aborted virtually 
every attempt to move off since nobody offers the range of products or 
flexibility they do.

They also have solutions for delivering 911 to PBX extensions without a 
DID, which in the context of this thread is a huge cost-saving proposition.


On 01/19/2013 05:21 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote:
> !!!
>
> Thanks for this.  Very interesting.
>
> Perhaps I should be asking my E911 provider if they plan to have VPC capability any time soon, or even consider a switch to 911Enable.
>
> -- Nathan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 5:10 PM
> To: 'Mary Lou Carey'; 'Jay Hennigan'; 'VoiceOps'
> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] 911 address policy for company phones at home
>
> It looks like there are vendors that make it possible for PSAPs to access
> near-realtime info:
> http://www1.911enable.com/resource-center/faq (see "What is a VoIP
> Positioning Center?")
>
> Frank
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org]
> On Behalf Of Mary Lou Carey
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 8:17 AM
> To: 'Jay Hennigan'; 'VoiceOps'
> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] 911 address policy for company phones at home
>
> PBXs can associate a single line for one location or have multiple lines,
> one for each location so that there is an address in the ALI database for
> each location. These lines are all fixed though so it's very different from
> VOIP because the end user can move their phone to any location that has
> internet access and use it without the switch being re-programmed. That's
> why there is a requirement for the CLEC to offer a way for the customer to
> update their information in the ALI database themselves.
>
> Someone asked me about who provides the VOIP ALI update solution and I
> couldn't find a provider, but in researching it I did find that there
> appears to be an issue with this method because the ALI database doesn't
> update in real time and since users could plug their phone in and update the
> address, it didn't mean that the ALI database identified the location
> correctly. YMAX commented to the FCC in November 2011 (see the link below)
> that they had a solution that could work. It involved attaching a GSM
> cellular transceiver to their MagicJack device so the location could be
> identified but it also relied on having some type of database with customer
> locations to help it identify which PSAP needed to be contacted so it
> doesn't appear that is totally thought out either. It appears to me that
> even though there are some requirements that the FCC put out about updating
> the ALI database, the details of exactly how that will work aren't totally
> worked out because of the issue with the ALI database. To me......that seems
> like a great business opportunity for someone! If you could figure out how
> to get a VOIP phone to automatically identify the exact location of the
> phone whenever its plugged in and transmit that location to a VOIP ALI
> database (which you'd need to create), then you could sell the service to
> both PSAPs AND VOIP providers!
>
> http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view;jsessionid=c1M1QZvLvW9XfyYDpTwlMGN1QK
> T7yhs21npc4ThYvwR61R6JK4yv!-56284754!-224088840?id=7021744691
>
>
> Mary Lou Carey
> BackUP Telecom Consulting
> marylou at backuptelecom.com
> Office: 615-791-9969 x 2001
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org]
> On Behalf Of Jay Hennigan
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 6:33 PM
> To: VoiceOps
> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] 911 address policy for company phones at home
>
> On 1/18/13 3:46 PM, Mike Ray wrote:
>> The difference here is the demarcation point.  If you're handing off
>> analog lines, there are two important differences:
>>
>> 1. You're not providing the PBX functionality as part of the telephone
>> service and, 2. You're using a technology that is incapable of sending
>> a different ANI than what's in your switch for each line.
> An extension-only SIP phone doesn't have a unique ANI.
>
>> So the requirement here is that the e911 ALI address must match the
>> physical location where you have those lines installed.
> But there are no "lines" for DID-less extensions or for that matter an
> "installation" in the case of softphones.
>
> The company HQ where the main ANI is answered is the ALI address.  Call it
> and talk to the receptionist.  Drive there in a police car and visit the
> same receptionist.
>
>> If you are looking to protect yourself from the customer moving to a
>> new location, ATA, PBX and all, you just use a contract provision
>> requiring them to notify you of address changes.  You could also
>> require them to have you move the service to the new location for more
> security there.
>
> Yes, and you should.
>
>> So, different animal that the hosted PBX question...
> ATA, PBX and all is indeed a different animal than an extension-only remote
> phone.
>
> The problem, and I don't know if there is a full solution, is that PSTN
> telephone numbers have always been used to identify the destination of a
> call.  9-1-1 assumes that this identifier of a destination positively and
> unequivocally also identifies the origin.
>
> Think in terms of laptops with softphones.  There is no way to make that
> work with the present 9-1-1 infrastructure.
>
> --
> Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay at impulse.net Impulse
> Internet Service  -  http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and
> internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops



More information about the VoiceOps mailing list