[VoiceOps] Call quality issue / survey

Nick Olsen nick at flhsi.com
Mon Mar 11 10:30:38 EDT 2013

This was my experience as well. 5083 is better. 
 Nick Olsen
Network Operations (855) FLSPEED  x106

From: "Gabriel Gunderson" <gabe at gundy.org>
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 9:29 PM
To: "Nathan Anderson" <nathana at fsr.com>
Cc: "voiceops at voiceops.org" <voiceops at voiceops.org>
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Call quality issue / survey

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Nathan Anderson <nathana at fsr.com> wrote: 

Calls placed from XO eSIP and AT&T cell, exact same results: 

> 208-301-5083 
:00 No ringback 
:01.5 Music starts 
:03 Silence and then woman speaking on the IVR. Consistent volume 

> 208-301-5084 
:00 No ringback 
:07 Loud click 
:10 Her voice is very weak and fades in (and is somewhat choppy) 
:12 Normal from that point forward 

208-301-5083 is far and away better. Sounds better, starts quicker, no 
awkward silence. 

What do I win for playing? 

VoiceOps mailing list 
VoiceOps at voiceops.org 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20130311/6324847b/attachment.html>

More information about the VoiceOps mailing list