[VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

[Gurskis, Marius]

Tested ok over Level3 and Verizon SIP today


- Marius

-----Original Message-----
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Paul Timmins
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 4:02 PM
To: Adam Vocks; voiceops at voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

Level 3 is a big wholesale route for a lot of smaller IXC carriers and VoIP providers, so when they fix it, you'll probably see immense improvement.

On 07/15/2014 02:10 PM, Adam Vocks wrote:
> I'm really hoping Level3 is having a routing issue with our code.  
> Some tried a call on level3 to us which failed.  Odd things is that 
> Level3 is directly connected to the Tandem we subtend.  I wouldn't 
> think Level3 would send it off their network???
>
> Adam
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of 
> Paul Timmins
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 12:30 PM
> To: voiceops at voiceops.org
> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777
>
> What's worse really is not that you have to look at ILEC tandems out 
> of area - they don't perform any route filtering, if the originating 
> caller is calling out of area, it gets sent to their PIC/LPIC LD carrier.
>
> So what you really need is every IXC in the country to make sure they 
> have a route to you either directly, through whatever tandem homing 
> arrangements you have, or via another IXC (really common especially in 
> rural areas to see a Level 3/Global Crossing hand off to 
> Qwest/AT&T/Verizon for the final termination.).
>
> -Paul
>
> On 07/15/2014 10:52 AM, Adam Vocks wrote:
>> So, at the very least, I need to start looking at each of the ILEC's 
>> tandems in a specific LATA?
>>
>> Adam
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of 
>> Alex Balashov
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:48 AM
>> To: voiceops at voiceops.org
>> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777
>>
>> On 07/15/2014 10:44 AM, Adam Vocks wrote:
>>
>>> :-)
>>>
>>> Take Kidd's call from Verizon in Colorado.  If there isn't our 
>>> exchange in their local switch, do they forward the call on to 
>>> another switch in hopes that it will know where to send it?  Similar 
>>> to a default gateway in IP world?
>> It would get kicked up to an ILEC tandem inside that LATA. There is 
>> really no default gateway beyond that; at that point, you've already 
>> exited into what the IP world would call "default route-free" or 
>> "Tier 1" routing space.
>>
>> --
>> Alex Balashov - Principal
>> Evariste Systems LLC
>> Tel: +1-678-954-0670
>> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
>>
>> Please be kind to the English language:
>>
>> http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/232906
>> _______________________________________________
>> VoiceOps mailing list
>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> VoiceOps mailing list
>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps at voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops


This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.