[VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

[Adam Vocks]

Jared, wondering if Hypercube ever got back with you?  I’ve here a couple people tell me now that Hypercube has the lowest rate for 217/777 so I’m wondering if most LCR engines choose that carrier.

 

Adam

 

From: compuwizz at gmail.com [mailto:compuwizz at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jared Geiger
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 1:20 PM
To: Adam Vocks
Cc: VoiceOps
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

 

I have a trouble ticket open with Hypercube. Their rate is super low for this NPA/NXX and is the route has long PDD then fails. So I'm wondering if once this route is fixed, if most everyone else's routes will get fixed.

 

I guess Level3 fixing it will help as well.

 

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Adam Vocks <Adam.Vocks at cticomputers.com> wrote:

I'm really hoping Level3 is having a routing issue with our code.  Some
tried a call on level3 to us which failed.  Odd things is that Level3 is
directly connected to the Tandem we subtend.  I wouldn't think Level3
would send it off their network???

Adam


-----Original Message-----
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Paul
Timmins
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 12:30 PM
To: voiceops at voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

What's worse really is not that you have to look at ILEC tandems out of
area - they don't perform any route filtering, if the originating caller
is calling out of area, it gets sent to their PIC/LPIC LD carrier.

So what you really need is every IXC in the country to make sure they
have a route to you either directly, through whatever tandem homing
arrangements you have, or via another IXC (really common especially in
rural areas to see a Level 3/Global Crossing hand off to
Qwest/AT&T/Verizon for the final termination.).

-Paul

On 07/15/2014 10:52 AM, Adam Vocks wrote:
> So, at the very least, I need to start looking at each of the ILEC's
> tandems in a specific LATA?
>
> Adam
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of
> Alex Balashov
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:48 AM
> To: voiceops at voiceops.org
> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777
>
> On 07/15/2014 10:44 AM, Adam Vocks wrote:
>
>> :-)
>>
>> Take Kidd's call from Verizon in Colorado.  If there isn't our
>> exchange in their local switch, do they forward the call on to
>> another switch in hopes that it will know where to send it?  Similar
>> to a default gateway in IP world?
> It would get kicked up to an ILEC tandem inside that LATA. There is
> really no default gateway beyond that; at that point, you've already
> exited into what the IP world would call "default route-free" or "Tier

> 1" routing space.
>
> --
> Alex Balashov - Principal
> Evariste Systems LLC
> Tel: +1-678-954-0670 <tel:%2B1-678-954-0670> 
> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
>
> Please be kind to the English language:
>
> http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/232906
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps at voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps at voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20140717/b756b99f/attachment.html>