[VoiceOps] Future of the Traditional PSTN vs VOIP and VoLTE

Erik Flournoy erik at eespro.com
Sat Dec 5 17:14:13 EST 2015

Additionally to come to Neustar NPAC extremely LATE proposal rescue of
using the IP and SMS fields in the NPAC to packet route calls instead of
via the TDM/SS7 Path that would kinda remove IQ from the path and allow
carriers to directly connect via packets.  Put the call on the IP packet
path if it's voice and use TDM only for faxing which I wish would disappear
for goodness sakes.

On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com>

> On 12/05/2015 05:05 PM, Erik Flournoy wrote:
> If a packet transverses your entire network as a packet then it's never
>> a toll charge. It's a packet.
> Well, right. :-) No provider of voice networks wants value-added services
> to go away and be replaced by OTT applications for whom they're just a
> low-margin, flat-rate, 95% percentile-billed transport layer.
> To a point, you can understand where they're coming from. They do the
> hard, capital-intensive work of building out the network, while some clever
> mobile app out of Silicon Valley pockets all the profits. That wasn't the
> assumption from which they built anything.
> --
> Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
> 303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300
> Atlanta, GA 30346
> United States
> Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct)
> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20151205/9bb4c8a5/attachment.html>

More information about the VoiceOps mailing list