[VoiceOps] Virtualized SBC

[Pete Eisengrein]

> my point was that they, of all

> things, are a poor standard

> bearer for the NFV marketing-

> gasm.



With centralized licensing and the ability to scale resources when and
where you need them, I would argue they are the perfect device for the NFV
marketing-gasm (LOL).

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com>
wrote:

> On 04/06/2016 10:54 PM, Ryan Delgrosso wrote:
>
> an SBC ... is a demarcation and control point between network
>> segments where you can inject interworking and business logic.
>>
>
> Absolutely, at >= Layer 5.
>
> If it's news to anyone here that you can virtualise applications, they've
> got some catching up to do.
>
> Anyway, my argument wasn't that SBCs serve no valid purposes. You've done
> a good job of outlining them. Instead, my point was that they, of all
> things, are a poor standard bearer for the NFV marketing-gasm.
>
> -- Alex
>
> --
> Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
> 1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700
> Atlanta, GA 30309
> United States
>
> Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct)
> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20160407/7e152a71/attachment.html>