[VoiceOps] Recommendations for high-cps SS7 OC-X gear?

[Anthony Orlando]

Avoid Meta at all cost. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 20, 2016, at 10:35 PM, Paul Timmins <paul at timmins.net> wrote:
> 
> You're going to handle 500CPS of legacy sonet based TDM and question dropping 7 figures on the solution? *cringes*
> 
> This is literally what platforms like metaswitch, sonus and many others are made for. If you're looking for low cost, Taqua's solution is decent, and if you need to take that entire OC-48, you're all but eyeballs deep in Sonus or Metaswitch land.
> 
> -Paul
> 
>> On Apr 20, 2016, at 17:54, Brooks Bridges <bbridges at o1.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Looking for suggestions for NEBS compliant gear that can support SS7, handle OC-3 or higher levels of channels, and can support (in aggregate) up to around 500 cps through a *good* (key word) SIP interface.  I’m willing to entertain the idea of a single larger device that can take a full OC-48 and support the full 500 cps, but I’d prefer spread the load across multiple devices and smaller interfaces for load balancing and redundancy.
>>  
>> Any pointers?  Obviously there are products out there by the really big players, but I’d really rather not have to drop 7 figures on this project unless I have to.
>>  
>> Thanks!
>>  
>> Brooks Bridges | Sr. Voice Services Engineer
>> O1 Communications
>> 5190 Golden Foothill Pkwy
>> El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
>> office: 916.235.2097 | main: 888.444.1111, Option 2
>> email: bbridges at o1.com | web: www.o1.com
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> VoiceOps mailing list
>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
> 
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20160421/1b923059/attachment.html>