[VoiceOps] Recommendations for high-cps SS7 OC-X gear?

[Calvin Ellison]

Anyone using TelcoBridges gear?



Regards,

*Calvin Ellison*
Voice Operations Engineer
calvin.ellison at voxox.com
+1 (213) 285-0555

-----------------------------------------------
*voxox.com <http://www.voxox.com/> *
5825 Oberlin Drive, Suite 5
San Diego, CA 92121
[image: Voxox]

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Brandon Buckner <brandon at kamikos.com>
wrote:

> Just curious: Is there a reason to avoid Metaswitch?
>
> My main experience is in Metaswitch and Sonus, but in Metaswitch it was
> limited to the 2510 and 3510 gateways and the accompanying servers up to
> 7.4 software and none of the newer blade platforms. At the time I would
> have said that Metaswitch would have worked quite well for what is being
> asked, especially if wanting to split across many smaller gateways and
> geographically distributed. Is there something with the new hardware and/or
> software I don't know about quality-wise?
>
> Sonus killed off the GSX4000 which would have lent better to spreading
> around a bunch of smaller boxes. They still have the GSX9000 which goes up
> to single OC-3 cards (so you'd have to have a couple to split an OC-48
> still), but their main push seems to be the SBC5210 and SBC7000 which are
> IP only, no TDM. But spread across gateways the call processing can easily
> do the 500 CPS.
>
> On 4/21/2016 5:00 AM, Anthony Orlando via VoiceOps wrote:
>
> Avoid Meta at all cost.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 20, 2016, at 10:35 PM, Paul Timmins < <paul at timmins.net>
> paul at timmins.net> wrote:
>
> You're going to handle 500CPS of legacy sonet based TDM and question
> dropping 7 figures on the solution? *cringes*
>
> This is literally what platforms like metaswitch, sonus and many others
> are made for. If you're looking for low cost, Taqua's solution is decent,
> and if you need to take that entire OC-48, you're all but eyeballs deep in
> Sonus or Metaswitch land.
>
> -Paul
>
> On Apr 20, 2016, at 17:54, Brooks Bridges <bbridges at o1.com> wrote:
>
> Looking for suggestions for NEBS compliant gear that can support SS7,
> handle OC-3 or higher levels of channels, and can support (in aggregate) up
> to around 500 cps through a **good** (key word) SIP interface.  I’m
> willing to entertain the idea of a single larger device that can take a
> full OC-48 and support the full 500 cps, but I’d prefer spread the load
> across multiple devices and smaller interfaces for load balancing and
> redundancy.
>
> Any pointers?  Obviously there are products out there by the really big
> players, but I’d really rather not have to drop 7 figures on this project
> unless I have to.
>
> Thanks!
>
> *Brooks Bridges | *Sr. Voice Services Engineer
> *O1 Communications*
> 5190 Golden Foothill Pkwy
> El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
> *office:* 916.235.2097 | *main:* 888.444.1111, Option 2
> *email:*  <bbridges at o1.com>bbridges at o1.com | *web:*  <http://www.o1.com/>
> www.o1.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing listVoiceOps at voiceops.orghttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20160422/3bff4a29/attachment-0001.html>