[VoiceOps] Is it possible for US DID to have Canadian service address?

[Victor Chukalovskiy]

Thanks Peter, your comment made my day! I see your point... will wait if 
someone else has a word on it!

On 16-02-18 03:38 PM, Peter Beckman wrote:
> (3) Porting is inconsistent and awful, and there are no rules.
>
> Maybe there are rules that would prevent a CA address from being on 
> the CSR
> for a US DID... but I wouldn't be surprised if those rules were not
> followed.
>
> Also, many resellers put their own US address on the CSR, rather than the
> end users, maybe to follow the rules, maybe because that's just easier.
>
> Good luck!
>
> Beckman
>
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016, Victor Chukalovskiy wrote:
>
>> Good day,
>>
>> Coming from Canadian CLEC background. Have tricky question for US LNP 
>> and associated guidelines, truly looking for your feedback. For the 
>> purposes of LNP, is it possible for US number to have Canadian 
>> service address?
>>
>> Major US CLEC  does not even allow us to enter Canadian address that 
>> we know is a service address for a US DID we want to port-in with 
>> them. So I conclude either of the two possibilities is true:
>>
>> (1) Their portal is doing right, and the Canadian address we are 
>> trying to enter is not the true service address for the number in 
>> question. We should dig deeper and there must be some (perhaps 
>> place-holder) US address behind the DID.
>> OR
>> (2) Their portal is not implemented right, and simply is not designed 
>> with this small but possible special case in mind.
>>
>> So which of the statements would be true?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> -Victor
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> VoiceOps mailing list
>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>
> Peter Beckman Internet Guy
> beckman at angryox.com http://www.angryox.com/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>