[VoiceOps] Appearance of an International call
Carlos Alvarez
caalvarez at gmail.com
Wed Jun 15 17:45:15 EDT 2016
Is there a way to know if a handset is using VoLTE? IE, so we could
specifically test it? Can you be sure the Androids were VoLTE capable?
The VoLTE network could be handling things completely differently and I
don't think it's safe to assume that it's not a carrier to carrier issue.
I would still recommend trying calls with any other carrier if at all
possible. And if you'd like, I can try a call from our Asterisk via Onvoy
to one of the problem phones and see what happens. I don't think it's safe
to eliminate ANY item, including your switch. Like I said in the private
e-mail, we're fighting a signaling issue right now that ONLY happens if
it's from our primary server, to Onvoy, to certain other carriers, and it's
a transfer. Eliminate any one and the problem goes away.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Kidd Filby <kiddfilby at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Pete;
>
> Thanks for the chime-in. That must have been a fun one to chase as well.
>
> Well, I cannot say... for certain, it is an iOS problem or directly
> related to the iPhone. Here is what I know for sure, from testing.
>
> 1. We have only gotten complaints related to users of iPhones
> 2. I have made test calls to Android devices and have not had the
> problem occur
> 1. We have made numerous test calls to (4) different Android models of
> Verizon phones w/o any issue
> 2.
> 3. However, I have also made calls to Verizon iPhones that did not
> reproduce the problem
> 3. We have troubles reported to us relating to both Verizon and
> AT&T wireless end users
> 1. Have all been end users with iPhones
> 4. As stated earlier, when the VZN Engineer deactivated VoLTE on
> the iPhone, the information displayed correctly
>
> The reason why its not as wide spread, I think, is that people mostly call
> people they know and the contact list on their cell phone overrides the
> presentation and a lot more calls are wireless to wireless today (even on
> the same network) that were landline related in the past.
>
> It's definitely a strange one.
>
>
> Thanks;
>
> Kidd
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Pete Mundy <pete at fiberphone.co.nz> wrote:
>
>>
>> Do you think this is an iPhone-specific issue? Ie a fault in iOS and the
>> way it's dealing with decoding the caller ID?
>>
>> We saw similar issues with txt messages from other mobile users inside
>> our country (New Zealand) way back when the iPhone first hit the market.
>> Basically txt messages would be shown as coming from the full number
>> including country code prefix (+64) and not matched against the number
>> already in the contacts list. Users would then add the new number to the
>> existing contact, then when they tried to txt or call the number back the
>> carrier would refuse the transmission. It all came right once Apple
>> cottoned on to the problem and a fix was included in an iOS update
>> (although it took like 2 months for that to occur, meanwhile pretty much
>> everyone with an iPhone in NZ experienced the hassle of it).
>>
>> I just wonder if it might be worth testing the same scenario from an
>> Android phone to see if it works. That may help discount the carriers and
>> upstreams as being part of the equation and give you more credence when
>> trying to escalate the issue to Apple (and good luck with that too!).
>>
>> Pete
>>
>> Ps, yes I also giggled at the Comic Sans on the first posting too ;)
>>
>>
>> > On 16/06/2016, at 6:54 am, Carlos Alvarez <caalvarez at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > That sort of conversation was the intent of my original message. We
>> have seen odd things happen from one carrier to another when we don't send
>> the whole presentation. The carriers will accept a 10 digit caller ID but
>> then something strange will happen at random. So that's just one of many
>> things that could be going on.
>> >
>> > Sent from my iPhone
>> >
>> >> On Jun 15, 2016, at 10:57 AM, Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Comic sans isn't a fashion accessory in my part of town.
>> >>
>> >> I figure this is an issue of presentation and locality setting
>> transmission. Don't GSM/3GPP and LTE require all numbers to be internally
>> represented as fully-qualified E.164 anyhow? What gives a number "local"
>> presentation is a setting on the phone that says "I'm within this country
>> code", and I imagine that whether this is honoured can be modulated via
>> some calling number presentation setting in the signalling message.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> VoiceOps mailing list
>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Kidd Filby
> 661.557.5640 (C)
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/kiddfilby
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20160615/090065e0/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the VoiceOps
mailing list