[VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability
Paul Timmins
paul at timmins.net
Thu Mar 17 19:55:43 EDT 2016
Sadly, assassins win if i stop breathing, so if someone starts to choke
me, I fight it the best I can and run away at my earliest opportunity.
On 03/17/2016 07:38 PM, Anthony Orlando via VoiceOps wrote:
> It's a shame we can't support them. This could be anyone of us.
> Hackers win if you port away.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 17, 2016, at 5:43 PM, Robert Johnson <fasterfourier at gmail.com
> <mailto:fasterfourier at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> Their primary SBC and DR IP are both in the same IP netblock, so
>> whenever the DDOS hits, both IPs are affected. The past few outages
>> have involved 80% packet loss or so to both hosts, so some calls do
>> make their way through, and plenty of wierdness ensues when an INVITE
>> makes its way through but not the OK on the way back.
>>
>> Can't wait to get our numbers ported out.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Nate Burke <nate at blastcomm.com
>> <mailto:nate at blastcomm.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Annnd they're down again.
>>
>>
>> On 3/17/2016 5:14 PM, Nate Burke wrote:
>>> 6 calls from 4 different CID numbers. All within 3 minutes.
>>>
>>> On 3/17/2016 4:58 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yesterday I definitely saw calls coming from the DR IP in my
>>>> logs, but I had not yet added that IP as a peerin our SBC.
>>>> I'll have to comb through logs today to see if we got any.
>>>>
>>>> Are you saying that the multiple calls you saw coming to your
>>>> desk were all from the same number? If I had to guess, their
>>>> side probably sent continuous INVITEs to you when it failed to
>>>> get back an OK for any of them (not that you weren't sending
>>>> back OK, but that their either didn't reach their SBC or did
>>>> not reach it in a timely manner).
>>>>
>>>> -- Nathan
>>>>
>>>> *From:*VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] *On
>>>> Behalf Of *Jeff Waddell
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 17, 2016 2:53 PM
>>>> *To:* Nate Burke
>>>> *Cc:* voiceops at voiceops.org <mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability
>>>>
>>>> That is the issue a lot of our customers are reporting - where
>>>> multiple calls are sent....
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Nate Burke <nate at blastcomm.com
>>>> <mailto:nate at blastcomm.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I didn't see any traffic increment on the DR IP Address in my
>>>> firewall rules, but this was odd. During the 15 minute period,
>>>> I had probably 5 or 6 simultaneous calls ring into my desk. I
>>>> normally only take a handfull of calls a day.
>>>>
>>>> On 3/17/2016 4:39 PM, Jeff Waddell wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We implemented it too - I haven't checked to see if any
>>>> traffic was sent across it
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Nate Burke
>>>> <nate at blastcomm.com <mailto:nate at blastcomm.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Only 15 Minutes this time though. I had implemented the
>>>> Disaster Recover Trunk as mentioned previously, but I
>>>> didn't seem to be getting any calls completed through it.
>>>>
>>>> On 3/17/2016 4:16 PM, Shripal Daphtary wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Down again!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Shripal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 16, 2016, at 9:50 AM, Nate Burke
>>>> <nate at blastcomm.com <mailto:nate at blastcomm.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Looks like it just came back up for me. Just over
>>>> 30 min.
>>>>
>>>> Nate
>>>>
>>>> On 3/16/2016 8:45 AM, Shripal Daphtary wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We are experiencing an outage as well.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Shripal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 16, 2016, at 9:36 AM, Nate Burke
>>>> <nate at blastcomm.com
>>>> <mailto:nate at blastcomm.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Problems again this morning? Looks to be
>>>> acting the same as it has been.
>>>>
>>>> On 3/11/2016 6:00 PM, Alexander Lopez wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I added them to our monitoring
>>>> platform, stated getting alarms this
>>>> past hour or so.
>>>>
>>>> Up and down.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original message --------
>>>> From: Nathan Anderson <nathana at fsr.com>
>>>> <mailto:nathana at fsr.com>
>>>> Date: 3/11/2016 6:31 PM (GMT-05:00)
>>>> To: 'Nate Burke' <nate at blastcomm.com>
>>>> <mailto:nate at blastcomm.com>,
>>>> voiceops at voiceops.org
>>>> <mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP
>>>> Innovations reliability
>>>>
>>>> ...aaaaaand we're back.
>>>>
>>>> -- Nathan
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: VoiceOps
>>>> [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org]
>>>> On Behalf Of Nathan Anderson
>>>> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 3:30 PM
>>>> To: 'Nate Burke'; voiceops at voiceops.org
>>>> <mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP
>>>> Innovations reliability
>>>>
>>>> It *feels* like they are under attack
>>>> again, since I get a response to a ping
>>>> once every 20 or so.
>>>>
>>>> -- Nathan
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: VoiceOps
>>>> [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org]
>>>> On Behalf Of Nathan Anderson
>>>> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 3:28 PM
>>>> To: 'Nate Burke'; voiceops at voiceops.org
>>>> <mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP
>>>> Innovations reliability
>>>>
>>>> Confirmed.
>>>>
>>>> -- Nathan
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: VoiceOps
>>>> [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org]
>>>> On Behalf Of Nate Burke
>>>> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 3:26 PM
>>>> To: voiceops at voiceops.org
>>>> <mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP
>>>> Innovations reliability
>>>>
>>>> Anyone else show them down again right
>>>> now? My traceroutes aren't even
>>>> leaving Chicago. Dying at a Chicago hop
>>>> on Level3.
>>>>
>>>> Nate
>>>>
>>>> On 3/6/2016 6:50 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote:
>>>> > Did anybody else just suffer another
>>>> 45-minute-ish long outage from about
>>>> 4:00p PST to 4:45p PST (ending about 5
>>>> minutes ago)?
>>>> >
>>>> > -- Nathan
>>>> >
>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>> > From: frnkblk at iname.com
>>>> <mailto:frnkblk at iname.com>
>>>> [mailto:frnkblk at iname.com]
>>>> > Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2016 4:43 PM
>>>> > To: Nathan Anderson;
>>>> voiceops at voiceops.org
>>>> <mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>
>>>> > Subject: RE: VoIP Innovations reliability
>>>> >
>>>> > More here:
>>>> http://blog.voipinnovations.com/blog
>>>> >
>>>> > Frank
>>>> >
>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>> > From: VoiceOps
>>>> [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org]
>>>> On Behalf Of Nathan
>>>> > Anderson
>>>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 8:27 PM
>>>> > To: voiceops at voiceops.org
>>>> <mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>
>>>> > Subject: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations
>>>> reliability
>>>> >
>>>> > Holy schlamoly. Anybody else use them
>>>> here and being handed outage after
>>>> > outage over the last 2 days?
>>>> Seriously thinking at this point about
>>>> doing
>>>> > something else. This is ridiculous.
>>>> >
>>>> > I desperately need sleep and if my
>>>> cell goes off one more time...
>>>> >
>>>> > -- Nathan
>>>> >
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> > VoiceOps mailing list
>>>> > VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>>>> <mailto:VoiceOps at voiceops.org>
>>>> >
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> > VoiceOps mailing list
>>>> > VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>>>> <mailto:VoiceOps at voiceops.org>
>>>> >
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>>>>
>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20160317/aaed9193/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the VoiceOps
mailing list