[VoiceOps] Current state of the LCR art
abalashov at evaristesys.com
Thu Sep 6 11:58:59 EDT 2018
Oh, yeah. Forgot about that. Yes, I think this would be an excellent candidate for ThinQ.
Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors.
From: Ryan Delgrosso <ryandelgrosso at gmail.com>
To: voiceops at voiceops.org
Sent: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Current state of the LCR art
At your volumes you would not be well served to operate your own. The
care and feeding is relatively expensive and time consuming.
Have a strong look at Thinq as a managed LCR vendor. I am using them on
a few projects and am quite happy.
On 9/6/2018 7:02 AM, Dave Sill wrote:
> I’m interested in learning about current best practices regarding LCR
> in the CLEC context (~2M minutes / month of LD traffic). What
> software/vendors are you using (or avoiding)? What are the
> non-obvious pros and cons? How automated is your system / how much
> labor do you put in? What percentage are you saving over one provider
> with a good rate deck when all costs are considered? Any insights are
> I’m cross-posting this on the FISPA CLEC list, so I apologize if I hit
> you twice.
> Dave Sill
> Manager of Business Intelligence and Automation
> Socket Telecom
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
More information about the VoiceOps