[VoiceOps] Current state of the LCR art

[Alex Balashov]

Oh, yeah. Forgot about that. Yes, I think this would be an excellent candidate for ThinQ. 

--
Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Delgrosso <ryandelgrosso at gmail.com>
To: voiceops at voiceops.org
Sent: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Current state of the LCR art

At your volumes you would not be well served to operate your own. The 
care and feeding is relatively expensive and time consuming.

Have a strong look at Thinq as a managed LCR vendor. I am using them on 
a few projects and am quite happy.


On 9/6/2018 7:02 AM, Dave Sill wrote:
> All,
>
> I’m interested in learning about current best practices regarding LCR 
> in the CLEC context (~2M minutes / month of LD traffic).  What 
> software/vendors are you using (or avoiding)?  What are the 
> non-obvious pros and cons?  How automated is your system / how much 
> labor do you put in?  What percentage are you saving over one provider 
> with a good rate deck when all costs are considered?  Any insights are 
> appreciated.
>
> I’m cross-posting this on the FISPA CLEC list, so I apologize if I hit 
> you twice.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dave Sill
> Manager of Business Intelligence and Automation
> Socket Telecom
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops