[VoiceOps] Creating an International Rate Deck

Alex Balashov abalashov at evaristesys.com
Tue Jun 4 14:30:59 EDT 2019


So, use a hassle-free solution and let someone else set it up for you.

Not that we would know anything about that. :-)

On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 02:29:15PM -0400, Shripal Daphtary wrote:

> this is all so annoying b/c we do so little international,
> 
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 1:57 PM Jared Geiger <jared at compuwizz.net> wrote:
> 
> > Another annoyance to watch out for is all codes from various carriers
> > won't match up. For example UK Landlines. Some carriers will say country
> > code 44 is landlines and give you a rate, then break out 447XXX for the
> > mobiles. Others will give a rate for 441 and 442. Then some will give a
> > rate for 442, 4420, 44203, 44207 or some combination of those which they
> > should all end up being compressed to 442. So your LCR has to do the
> > longest prefix match per carrier and then compare against carriers. Not
> > necessarily shortest prefix match. For example:
> >
> > Number dialed: 44-20-7499-9000
> > Carrier A: 44 - 0.0025
> > Carrier B: 442 - 0.0045
> > Carrier C: 44207 - 0.0085
> >
> > The obvious LCR is carrier A, but the last time I tested A2Billing, it
> > would say Carrier C is the winner because the rest of the carriers don't
> > have a rate for 44207. The other LCR option at the time would do shortest
> > prefix match which could cause issues with mobile calls being incorrectly
> > routed and rated. Things may have changed as my experience with A2Billing
> > was many years ago, but it should apply to LCR calculations in general.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 10:24 AM Shripal Daphtary <shripald at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks Paul and Dovid --
> >>
> >> I guess the question is what if i get a completion for the most expensive
> >> carrier as opposed to the cheapest, and it turns out i'm underwater?  The
> >> issue is the variance btw carrier1 (cheapest) and carrier6 (most expensive)
> >> could be 40 cents at times or more.
> >>
> >> I'll take a look at GCS and R&R as well
> >>
> >> We have an implementation of a2 billing to route international, but use
> >> it mostly to limit fraud exposure.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 11:36 AM Paul Stamoulis <pstamoulis at onestoptel.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Int’l rating and routing is not for the feint of heart or the hurried –
> >>> 215k of unique rating/routing options or “breakouts” as known in the
> >>> industry, is not too bad.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> You can use MS excel if you have the time to continually update and are
> >>> familiar with excel macros but remember that rate updates come at least
> >>> 5once or twice a week with most vendors so times that by the number of
> >>> vendors and be ready to update-update-update or else you can lose money.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> You may be better off either purchasing specialized SW or using one of
> >>> the many cloud based companies to manage your rates for you; GCS is one
> >>> such company in the USA and R&R is another – I have no relations with
> >>> either company but I hear that they are both decent.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> You should try to use all 6 carriers because, you are going to find that
> >>> when one of the cheaper vendors does NOT work to one of the breakouts, then
> >>> usually the other cheap vendors do NOT either. That’s when you need to be 6
> >>> or more routes deep or risk upsetting clients.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> As far as the mark-up on rates, don’t sweat that too much round up and
> >>> have a larger markup for the cheaper rates. For retial certainly , you
> >>> should have more than enough room and for wholesale int’l sales, well
> >>> that’s a whole other subject that gets much more complex… good luck,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *Paul Stamoulis    +1 212 444 3003     Onestopcorp – thousands of
> >>> technology solutions... just one call!*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *Please connect at https://www.linkedin.com/in/paul-stamoulis-56504531/
> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/paul-stamoulis-56504531/>*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *From:* VoiceOps <voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org> *On Behalf Of *Shripal
> >>> Daphtary
> >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 4, 2019 10:10 AM
> >>> *To:* VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> >>> *Subject:* [VoiceOps] Creating an International Rate Deck
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hey group,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I have a question that I have been struggling with for years and have
> >>> never come up with a good solution for.  It revolves around International
> >>> Rate Deck creation, but i guess it could be for any tariff.   We have
> >>> multiple carriers for International, however, i'm trying out Thinq right
> >>> now so we can use their LCR.  Our other carriers aren't very successful
> >>> with Intl.  Thinq's rate deck to me is 6 carriers for each prefix, making
> >>> it around 215,000 lines. The carrier(s) that have the lowest cost for each
> >>> prefix varies, so i can't turn off the most expensive three or something
> >>> like that.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I was thinking of taking the least expensive 3 carriers and then
> >>> averaging them and creating my rate from that average and then only allow
> >>> Thinq to go 3 carriers deep. Does anyone have any experience with this?
> >>>  Are there any best practices?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The second part of the question is how does one calculate the profit
> >>> margin?  Let's say you wanted to make 35% for retail and 20% for wholesale,
> >>> but if you call UK landline, the cost is only 0.004.  Your rate  would be
> >>> 0.0054 for retail and 0.0048, which is nothing.  We have been doing
> >>> something like If your cost is less than 0.03, then increase by 35% or 20%
> >>> or whatever.  however, that doesn't always work if the cost is super close
> >>> to your target.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Does anyone have any hard and fast rules that they use when creating
> >>> decks? is there software that can help my puny brain think through this?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks !
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Shri
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> VoiceOps mailing list
> >> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > VoiceOps mailing list
> > VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
> >

> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops


-- 
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC

Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) 
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/


More information about the VoiceOps mailing list