[VoiceOps] [EXTERNAL] VoiceOps Digest, Vol 118, Issue 8
Jamie Montgomery
Jamie.Montgomery at comporium.com
Mon Jun 17 11:13:27 EDT 2019
Cant say it's 100% correct, but based on LERG8's V & H coordinates, the two rate centers are 482 miles apart. It also shows that each rate center has two unique NPA's in them as well. I would think they would not be in the same local calling area, but I don't know Canadian tarrifs.
Using a PERL script...
Distance between Coord 1 (03003, 00615 [45.140833, -61.986178]),
and coord 2 (03986, 01776 [45.397008, -71.891538])
is approximately: 482 miles
Jamie M.
-----Original Message-----
From: VoiceOps <voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org> On Behalf Of voiceops-request at voiceops.org
Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2019 12:00 PM
To: voiceops at voiceops.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] VoiceOps Digest, Vol 118, Issue 8
Send VoiceOps mailing list submissions to
voiceops at voiceops.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
voiceops-request at voiceops.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
voiceops-owner at voiceops.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of VoiceOps digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. LCA file for Broadworks across provinces / states
(Julien Lamarche)
2. Re: LCA file for Broadworks across provinces / states
(Alex Balashov)
3. Re: LCA file for Broadworks across provinces / states
(Mark R Lindsey, ECG)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 15:36:19 -0400
From: Julien Lamarche <jlam at credil.org>
To: voiceops at voiceops.org
Subject: [VoiceOps] LCA file for Broadworks across provinces / states
Message-ID: <7d22a018-533d-f6f7-6ee0-1188730fa867 at credil.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Hi,
I was building an LCA file for a VoIP provider that uses Broadworks.
I noticed that the LCA file examples I've been given only lists the rate center names, not the provinces. Yet in LERG6 and LERG8, short and long names for rate centers are not unique across all provinces / states.
Sherbrooke QC and Sherbrook NS, for example, is listed as SHERBROOKE for both it's shot and long name.
Should the LCA file distinguish these two rate centers by listing
SHERBROOKE, QC as PQSHERBROOKE? If not, what field in NNACL should I
use to distinguish them? Or do I have to start creating my own rate center names?
Julien
--
Make innovation easy
http://www.credil.org/
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 15:39:13 -0400
From: Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com>
To: voiceops at voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] LCA file for Broadworks across provinces /
states
Message-ID: <20190614193913.GA32221 at tlaquepaque.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
As far as I know the LERG does not have local calling tariff info per
se.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 03:36:19PM -0400, Julien Lamarche wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was building an LCA file for a VoIP provider that uses Broadworks.
>
> I noticed that the LCA file examples I've been given only lists the rate
> center names, not the provinces. Yet in LERG6 and LERG8, short and long
> names for rate centers are not unique across all provinces / states.
>
> Sherbrooke QC and Sherbrook NS, for example, is listed as SHERBROOKE for
> both it's shot and long name.
>
> Should the LCA file distinguish these two rate centers by listing
> SHERBROOKE, QC as PQSHERBROOKE? If not, what field in NNACL should I use
> to distinguish them? Or do I have to start creating my own rate center
> names?
>
>
>
> Julien
>
> --
> Make innovation easy
> http://www.credil.org/
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:41:50 -0600
From: "Mark R Lindsey, ECG" <lindsey at e-c-group.com>
To: Julien Lamarche <jlam at credil.org>
Cc: voiceops at voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] LCA file for Broadworks across provinces /
states
Message-ID:
<CACa+XsuW2R+G5TowE_z-o07c4gKS2x2NK8rsD+_S4B0NeSLF8g at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Are both SHERBROOKE ?s in the same LATA number? BroadWorks distinguishes
the same names based on LATA. E.g., there are tons of ?Springfield?s and
?Albany?s in the US and Canada but in different LATAs.
If you?re using BroadWorks LCA, then you?ll also need to load an
NNACL-formatted file. (I think that?s usually excerpted from LERG6.)
Of course, BroadWorks doesn?t really care where you get the data. It?s
certainly possible to create inconsistencies.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 13:36 Julien Lamarche <jlam at credil.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was building an LCA file for a VoIP provider that uses Broadworks.
>
> I noticed that the LCA file examples I've been given only lists the
> rate center names, not the provinces. Yet in LERG6 and LERG8, short and
> long names for rate centers are not unique across all provinces /
> states.
>
> Sherbrooke QC and Sherbrook NS, for example, is listed as SHERBROOKE for
> both it's shot and long name.
>
> Should the LCA file distinguish these two rate centers by listing
> SHERBROOKE, QC as PQSHERBROOKE? If not, what field in NNACL should I
> use to distinguish them? Or do I have to start creating my own rate
> center names?
>
>
>
> Julien
>
> --
> Make innovation easy
> http://www.credil.org/
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
--
Mark R Lindsey | Senior Member of Technical Staff / VP
+1-229-316-0013 | Calendar: https://ecg.co/lindsey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20190614/8b1c3d45/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps at voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
------------------------------
End of VoiceOps Digest, Vol 118, Issue 8
****************************************
More information about the VoiceOps
mailing list