[VoiceOps] Request for Opinions: High density ATA's

[Ryan Delgrosso]

Honestly just for signaling efficiency. I do everything with TLS, and 
maintaining 900+ TLS sessions all the time is wasteful, especially for 
endpoints that will be infrequently used. I would prefer to register a 
single signaling trunk per device.


On 3/21/2019 9:03 AM, Matthew Yaklin wrote:
>
> When I read your email the first thought that popped into my head was 
> a bunch of Calix E5-111s used for pennies on the dollar. They are 
> simply ADSL/POTs boxes. 48 ports of pots. But each line registers 
> individually. But at least the box is stupid dumb and you handle 
> everything on the switch side. I would not want anything complex on 
> site barring a distinct requirement. Of course just turn off the ADSL.
>
>
> Why do you prefer that the lines do not register individually? Do you 
> have a requirement for so much box intelligence in their closets?
>
>
> *Matthew Yaklin*
> Network Engineer
> *FirstLight*
> 359 Corporate Drive │ Portsmouth, NH 03801
> Mobile 603-845-5031
> myaklin at firstlight.net | www.firstlight.net
> /This email may contain FirstLight confidential and/or privileged 
> information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are directed/
> /not to read, disclose or otherwise use this transmission and to 
> immediately delete same. Delivery of this message is not intended/
> /to waive any applicable privileges./
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* VoiceOps <voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org> on behalf of Ryan 
> Delgrosso <ryandelgrosso at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 21, 2019 11:55:37 AM
> *To:* voiceops at voiceops.org
> *Subject:* [VoiceOps] Request for Opinions: High density ATA's
> I have found myself with a number of hospital opportunities and
> servicing the staff with IP phones is a no-brainer, however there is the
> need for multi-hundred room connectivity for patient room phones and the
> staff mandate is to keep it analog because "ip phones there will grow
> legs".
>
> I am looking for 24+ port density with amphenol connectors, and ideally
> some kind of rudimentary internal routing so i dont need to register all
> 24 discreet ports and can route by some header (to or uri) within a
> single registration.
>
> Right now im looking at AudioCodes and the Sangoma Vega series. Obihai
> would be my natural choice here but don't have anything that fits my
> density requirements.
>
> Any opinions on these or others I should consider. Anyone deploy these
> and can speak to the experience?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> -Ryan
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20190321/e6710a8b/attachment-0001.html>