[VoiceOps] Looking for cost-effective eSBC that supports inband DTMF <-> RFC2833 transcoding support

[Dovid Bender]

Both of them do both trans coding (for codecs) and can change DTMF for you.
It should not be hard to set up. If you need help feel free to email me off
list.



On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 3:03 PM Frank Bulk <frnkblk at iname.com> wrote:

> Do either of those support transcoding?  If so, would they be easy enough
> to set up for an enterprise-level IT person to get that set up?
>
>
>
> Frank
>
>
>
> *From:* Dovid Bender <dovid at telecurve.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 14, 2019 1:45 PM
> *To:* Frank Bulk <frnkblk at iname.com>
> *Cc:* Voiceops.org <voiceops at voiceops.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] Looking for cost-effective eSBC that supports
> inband DTMF <-> RFC2833 transcoding support
>
>
>
> Why not use something like FreeSwitch or Asterisk in the middle?
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 2:16 PM Frank Bulk <frnkblk at iname.com> wrote:
>
> We have an educational customer with an IVR that only supports RFC 2833 and
> an eSBC (Mitel border gateway) that cannot not perform transcoding from
> inband DTMF to RFC2833.  There are some local VoIP to VoIP calls where the
> caller's device only supports inband DTMF and our softswitch cannot
> transcode them, so the IVR doesn't work for some parents and constituents.
>
> We'd like to recommend a cost-effective eSBC that supports inband DTMF <->
> RFC2833 transcoding.
>
> Any recommendations from this group?  I looked at EdgeMarc, but apparently
> their newer models don't have a DSP, or at least that functionality,
> anymore.
>
> Frank
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20190514/165a22dd/attachment.htm>