[VoiceOps] iconectiv vs. Neustar

[Mary Lou Carey]

It was only the administrator of the main database (NPAC Helpdesk / LTI 
/ Granting Access to NPAC) that moved from NEUSTAR to iconectiv. 
Everyone still has their own systems that connect to the NPAC database 
and which you choose depends more on cost effectiveness than anything 
else. If you do less than 10 ports per month, NPAC Helpdesk is the 
cheapest way to go because there's no monthly fee. You only pay a "per 
request" fee but it's a higher amount per request. All other options 
have a monthly service charge with a set number of requests included.

MARY LOU CAREY
BackUP Telecom Consulting
Office: 615-791-9969
Cell: 615-796-1111

On 2021-02-22 12:08 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> I know that the database operations moved from Neustar to iconectiv a
> few years ago.
> 
> What are the pros\cons to operationally using iconectiv vs. Neustar?
> 
> My people are used to Neustar, but I can't help but feel behind if we
> don't move to iconectiv for everything we traditionally used Neustar
> for.
> 
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops