[VoiceOps] AT&T Verizon to block text messaging

Carlos Alvarez caalvarez at gmail.com
Thu Mar 4 12:36:28 EST 2021


So you're saying that user to user messaging will be limited?  I haven't
seen evidence of that.

The Bandwidth page says it's just for mass messaging:
What's happening?

Certain mobile carrier(s) are now adjusting the throughput caps they've
historically enforced on local messaging for business senders, also known
as A2P programs, while imposing new registration requirements and paying
additional fees. The throughput limits will vary, but wanted messages in
registered campaigns should receive better throughput than the traditional
1 message per second (MPS).

On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 10:33 AM Oren Yehezkely <orenyny at gmail.com> wrote:

> I would agree if this was the case. But it is not the case.
> That is the reason I suggest we learn more about it and fight it (if it
> matters to you).
>
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 12:30 PM Carlos Alvarez <caalvarez at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> As I understand it, this is only about the trash mass-send messaging, and
>> not user to user.  Right?  Anything that reduces business abuse of SMS is
>> good in my opinion.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 10:24 AM Oren Yehezkely <orenyny at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, it is what they call 10DLC. Here is what Bandwidth has put together
>>> for some more details.
>>>
>>> https://support.bandwidth.com/hc/en-us/articles/1500002422242-10DLC-Overview-and-FAQ
>>> I will gather more information and post what I can find.
>>>
>>> Kent described it correctly and it is probably a result of the FCC not
>>> regulating the market, which will now become the wild west.
>>> What Kent may be missing is that it is not only extra fees (as is the
>>> case with Verizon) but a whole registration requirement and actually
>>> blocking of messages from unregistered DIDs, as AT&T is about to implement
>>> their walled garden.
>>>
>>> If you offer SMS text messaging to your customers, you should be very
>>> worried, and join forces to fight it.
>>>
>>> Oren
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 12:15 PM Ivan Kovacevic <
>>> ivan.kovacevic at startelecom.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are you referring to A2P 10DLC?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.startelecom.ca>
>>>>
>>>> *Ivan Kovacevic*
>>>>
>>>> *www.startelecom.ca <http://www.startelecom.ca>*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 11:30 AM Oren Yehezkely <orenyny at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone have some deep knowledge about AT&T and Verizon's move to
>>>>> create their own walled gardens and prevent messages from the outside world
>>>>> from coming in, unless they approve each and every phone number (and you
>>>>> obviously pay for that approval)?
>>>>> Next thing they will block emails from other networks, or maybe all IP
>>>>> traffic.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Oren
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> VoiceOps mailing list
>>>>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> NOTE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of
>>>> the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged
>>>> information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
>>>> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
>>>> sender by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of the original
>>>> message.
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> VoiceOps mailing list
>>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> VoiceOps mailing list
>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20210304/155801ed/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the VoiceOps mailing list