[VoiceOps] Arbitration or Peering?

[Jared Geiger]

Thanks Jeff,

Thats probably the case referenced in the blog. Looks like the complaint is
over Toll Free compensation which I thought was pretty much going away
anyway.

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 3:16 PM Jeff Brower <jbrower at signalogic.com> wrote:

> Jared-
>
> Maybe this case ?
>
>   https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-373349A1.pdf
>
> seems to be pending / working its way through.
>
> "Since 2011, the Commission has taken numerous actions to modernize this
> outdated system and curb the harmful arbitrage that it invites."
>
> -Jeff
>
> Quoting Jared Geiger <compuwizz at gmail.com>:
>
> This blog post from Transnexus highlights a filing Inteliquent placed with
> the FCC about an Arbitrage Scheme.
> https://transnexus.com/blog/2022/access-arbitrage-rules-discussion/
>
> The link is broken to the original filing so I can't read the full details.
>
> Maybe I'm not understanding the full complaint, but Inteliquent is
> expecting a lot of traffic to come through them to the IPES's number ranges
> but they aren't getting the traffic. The "Wholesale Inbound Provider"
> instead is getting the traffic.
>
> Wouldn't this just be similar to private peering between providers? I've
> had "10 Digit peering" service before from a vendor but that product went
> away a few years ago.
>
> ~Jared
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20220512/2ba506fc/attachment.htm>