[VoiceOps] FCC RMD Naughty List

Dave Russo drusso at rushpost.com
Tue Dec 10 22:08:10 EST 2024


That is so mid

-dr

On Tue, Dec 10, 2024, at 3:05 PM, Alex Balashov via VoiceOps wrote:
> It's something I heard from my 9 year-old. I wouldn't know much about 
> it myself, I was half-listening because I was ordering something called 
> a "Skibidi Toilet". I gather it's "lit" and allows us to have a "fire 
> Christmas" or something.
>
>> On Dec 10, 2024, at 4:59 pm, Mike Hammett <voiceops at ics-il.net> wrote:
>> 
>> I'm not sure if I'm too old, too young, or simply not cool enough to know rizz.  ;-)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: "Alex Balashov via VoiceOps" <voiceops at voiceops.org>
>> To: voiceops at voiceops.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 3:47:55 PM
>> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] FCC RMD Naughty List
>> 
>> What kind of 'naughty' list is this? Literally almost everyone I know, or have ever worked for or with, is on it. 
>> 
>> This isn't a naughty list, this is the cool kids club. The people who aren't on it don't got rizz, or whatever the kids say nowadays.
>> 
>> -- Alex
>> 
>> > On Dec 10, 2024, at 4:42 pm, Dave Russo via VoiceOps <voiceops at voiceops.org> wrote:
>> > 
>> > Here is the FCC order & list mentioned: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-24-1235A1.pdf
>> > 
>> > Also somewhat related, I'm curious how some companies that claim to be STIR/SHAKEN compliant and are listed on iconectiv's authorized provider list get away with not being fully FCC compliant?
>> > 
>> > For example when we were looking for a new provider it came to my attention that Atheral is 5 years behind on its FCC 499 filings... Looks like it last filed in 2019: https://apps.fcc.gov/cgb/form499/499detail.cfm?FilerNum=832820
>> > 
>> > Does this mean it can get shut down any time the FCC decides to do that? Will resellers that use them be at risk of losing service or subject to some FCC action themselves?
>> > 
>> > -dr
>> > 
>> > 
>> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024, at 2:17 PM, Mike Hammett via VoiceOps wrote:
>> >> How many of you are on the Robocall Mitigation Database naughty list that the FCC just sent out?
>> >> 
>> >> It'd be nice if they told you *WHY* your filing was deficient. Instead, they just generically list broad categories that you may or may not fit into.
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> -----
>> >> Mike Hammett
>> >> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> >> http://www.ics-il.com
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> Midwest Internet Exchange
>> >> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> VoiceOps mailing list
>> >> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>> >> 
>> > 
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > VoiceOps mailing list
>> > VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Alex Balashov
>> Principal Consultant
>> Evariste Systems LLC
>> Web: https://evaristesys.com
>> Tel: +1-706-510-6800
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> VoiceOps mailing list
>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
>
> -- 
> Alex Balashov
> Principal Consultant
> Evariste Systems LLC
> Web: https://evaristesys.com
> Tel: +1-706-510-6800
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops


More information about the VoiceOps mailing list